User talk:Hugo22~enwiki

Unspecified source for Image:Verbum.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Verbum.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ccwaters 19:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on [[User talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Katalaveno^T_C 00:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Galician people

Hi! Thanks for your message... I'm glad you have registered and are going to be an editor! Hopefully there are enough links in the Welcome section above to help you with the hows of editing on Wikipedia.

I fully understand your concern about the Galician people article. However, normal practice at Wikipedia requires a discussion (on the article's 'Talk' page) about the information in an article before you delete it, or at least the amount you deleted. If you are unhappy with the accuracy, please feel free to rewrite it and state your sources in the article (use the <ref> tags). Also feel free to open a full discussion about the content of any article on its associated 'Talk' page.

If I can help you in any way with editing on Wikipedia, please do not hesitate to ask for help. Cheers! Katalaveno^T_C 00:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Galician people

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Hugo22! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 00:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Emilia Pardo Bazán. Thank you. Road Wizard (talk) 13:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Galician people

Hi! Take a look at the article now. Did my edit fix the problem you are concerned with? κaτaʟaveno^T_C 22:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Hugo22. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Hugo22~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

13:56, 22 April 2015 (UTC)