User talk:HughMcHardy

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 15:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HughMcHardy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What the hell? I am NOT a sock.

Decline reason:

Insufficient grounds for making such determination. Also comment and link below. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin, please compare this unblock request with previous sock unblock request here. TN X Man 15:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also...ahem...[1][2] --Smashville^talk 15:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GerryLongfellow for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. raseaC^{talk to me} 18:35, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]