Jump to content

User talk:HuggleCategory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who is the owner of this account, and why are you adding users to a category when we already have Wikipedia:Huggle/Users? -- Gurchzilla (talk) 09:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that they are on that page, but there is also a category for users who use huggle, and if theyre not in that category, I add them in. i dont know who created that category, but some user started adding people in, and then i started to. HuggleCategory (talk) 23:53, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


sup —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.35.137.189 (talk) 00:28, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add me

[edit]

Please don't add that category to my page. Thanks. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry..HuggleCategory (talk) 01:09, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's ok you didn't know! :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 00:37, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who is running this

[edit]

Who is running this apparently unauthorised bot and can you give me a single good reason not to block you? – iridescent 19:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't look like a bot - the edits tend to be spaced like normal human ones and the contribs show this has been going on a while - but it's certainly a rather bizarre purpose for an account. I can't think of a good reason why anyone would do this. --Tombomp (talk/contribs) 20:09, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indefblocked unless/until someone offers a damn good explanation for this. It's either an unauthorised bot or an undisclosed SPA, neither of which should be editing userpages. Will watch this talkpage for an explanation. – iridescent 20:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a bot. i would just add users to that category if they were using Huggle but I guess i don't need too anymore cause of Wikipedia:Huggle/Users. does that category page need to be deleted then?.. HuggleCategory (talk) 03:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD'd – iridescent 14:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"a damn good explanation"? Where's the fire? -- Ned Scott 06:32, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]