User talk:Hudsoncr

Fair use rationale for File:Erica anderson jpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Erica anderson jpg.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 14:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Erika anderson jpg.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Erika anderson jpg.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 14:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Please don't copy material from ODUsports.com and paste it into articles, like you did at Mark West ([1], [2]) and other articles. You need to put as much as possible into your own words. Thanks, Zagalejo^^^ 06:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lieberman

You added a couple claims about Nancy, without providing a reference. I tracked down a reference for one claim, but haven't found one for the other claim. I won't be surprised, in fact I'll be stunned, if she isn't in the ODU Hall of Fame, but we need a reference. Her speaker bureau doesn't count. Please provide one if you can find one - if not, the claim will have to be removed.--SPhilbrick T 21:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Lieberman is a member of the ODU Sports Hall of Fame. She was inducted in 1985. just click on ODUsports.com then traditions then hall of fame

Thanks for your note and research, but please understand I am the sports media relations director at

ODU, so I would not put anything wrong informationally on our alumni(ie; Lieberman, Donovan, West, Hodge Purnell, Penicheiro, etc.).

Hudsoncr (talk) 20:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright on Wendy Larry

Hi Hudsoncr! Please note that the content you added to Wendy Larry appears to be copyrighted from the ODU website. Since Wikipedia releases its content under This Free License (which allows anyone anywhere to use, re-use, modify, parody, sell for a profit, or basically any purpose whatsoever), we must ensure that source material is similarly licensed.

I see that you say you are the sports media relations director for ODU. If you wish to release this text under that same free license (with the understanding that you would be allowing anyone to use it for any purpose, not just Wikipedia), please see WP:DCM and follow the instructions there. This will entail some private emailing to verify authority to make such a release, after which time that text can be re-added here.

Also please see WP:PAID and WP:COI. Since you are employed by ODU, you need to declare that on your user page to comply with the Terms of Service on paid editing.

I'm happy to assist or answer any questions you may have. Just reply here or on my talk page. Thanks! Crow^Caw 18:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Object of Obsession for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Object of Obsession is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Object of Obsession until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 01:12, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]