This User is currently blocked. 

 Hello! I am sorry to say I am currently blocked (Just see below for the unblock appeals if you really want to know why)
I will try and wait six month until trying to appeal again. Please feel free to expand/edit/move/delete my articles.
Thank you for your patience
 * Note: during this six months any messages would be unlikely to be answered

Welcome!

Hello, Huaxiazidi!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:57, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Huaxiazidi (talk) 11:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bi ( State) (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RetroCraft314 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Bi (state) instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bi ( State) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

<RetroCraft314 /> 14:27, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know cus I created the other one Huaxiazidi (talk) 17:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Huaxiazidi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <RetroCraft314 /> 14:27, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know cus i created the other one, how come the other one that got published didn't even need a review? Huaxiazidi (talk) 17:56, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Di'anmen

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Di'anmen, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:48, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

done Huaxiazidi (talk) 10:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Silver 2p moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Silver 2p. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar and it needs cleanup. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 16:02, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silver 2 pence

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Silver 2 pence

Hey Huaxiazidi, I noticed that you moved an article that I dratified back into the article space. For future reference, please do not do this until after you have resolved the issues. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 16:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please may I be unblocked.

Hi: @Firefly is there anything else i have to do? Huaxiazidi (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Huaxiazidi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I honestly didn't know you couldn't have multiple accounts. I apologize if I have breached the rules in anyway, could I at least get a warning telling me what I can and cannot do, I honestly didn't know that creating multiple accounts wasn't allowed, since on most platforms there is nothing against this. Now, I fully understand that creating multiple accounts is not allowed and doesn't contribute to Wikipedia, for which this block was issued, I sincerely promise that I now fully understand this and that like actions should not occur again.I wish to continue contributing to Wikipedia (on the China articles) if I am unblocked, since i have contributed usefully to Wikipedia in the past, i have created articles, translated and expanded stubs on one or two articles. If I was too be unblocked, please may an admin delete the other two accounts. Again, I sincerely promise this wont happen again. I apologize again if in my ignorance I have breached the rules. Huaxiazidi (talk) 20:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You created the sockpuppet TheSupremeComrade (talk · contribs) and asked yourself a question, which you then answered as if it were a discussion between two different people; you should not need to know beforehand that there is a rule specifically telling you not to give the misleading appearance that these accounts were separate people. With Huaxiaernv (talk · contribs) you added yourself to the "Vandal cabal" which, whether in jest or seriousness, suggested intentions to use that account for vandalism. This unblock request does not adqequately address the issues with your editing or with the sockpuppetry. Aoidh (talk) 16:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Aoidh First I would like to thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. Sorry for bothering you with a long passage, but I feel I have to address some issues. You have mentioned the vandal cabal so I will address that first. Isn't the vandal cabal just for humor, or is joining the cabal literally means that you are a vandal, but then why have the cabal in the first place. Does joining the cabal automatically make you a vandal In the same argument if you look again I have also added my self to the anti-vandalism unit so, I am not quite sure what you are attempting to suggest here. In all honesty I was not going to use that account for vandalism, and neither have I used it for vandalism, joking (badly) is not the same as having the intention to do so. I do not think your point here stands, neither do I think having a sense of humor is the same as serious trouble making but with the rest of your argument I inclined to agree with. Secondly, I now realize messaging myself was not the right thing to do and would appear as deliberate misinformation but then again who really would look at my talk page, I may have "appeared as two people" and been "misleading" but what motive is there behind this, was I trying to convince someone of an argument? Well, no: I asked my self a question on another account to test if someone leaves a message would it ping me. The reason I made it look like 2 people is because if it looked like I was talking to myself that would look quite stupid, again I apologize for being ignorant of the rules. I simply had no idea of sock puppetry and again i would apologize if my actions were seen as such. I don't want to be a pain and would understand if you don't want to read this, but I would rather like to make things to make things clear. What I have done I shall admit, but what I have not I shall not accept. Thank you Huaxiazidi (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoidh Again to the reason why the appeal does not mention sock puppetry or (what you think of) my edits is due to the fact that it says "messing about with multiple accounts" for the reason as to why I was blocked, I thought it was just because of the multiple accounts, if it isn't clear as to for what reason I was blocked, neither does it mention "Sock puppetry" or "edits" how is it possible for me to know what to add in my appeal. I don't want to sound like whining or trying to argue, but I feel like these things need to be addressed. I can only just hope that I will be given a second chance.

I would like to thank you if you took the time to read all of this, I know that you are a volunteer and you don't need to do this but I am extremely grateful that you reviewed my appeal. I do apologize if I have bothered you and if I have been a pain. But please do think about what I have said.

Thank you Huaxiazidi (talk) 21:11, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bi

Hello: @Z1720 I seen that you have messaged me about my article on Bi (state) I will try and get back if I am unblocked Huaxiazidi (talk) 20:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Remorse and Regret as well as hope: Please unblock me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Huaxiazidi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

First I would like to apologize to all because of my actions. I would like to apologize for sock puppetry, bad edits. As well as apologize for being misleading. For all of which I was obnoxious to before and @Aoidh has kindly pointed out to me. I created multiple accounts, not to be misleading but since I was ignorant of the rules. It is allowed for multiple accounts on most platforms I have been on, Wikipedia is the first that this has struck me.I was not warned about this either prior the block. I apologize for creating multiple accounts. I messaged myself, but this was not to be misleading, I was ignorant of the rules regarding this, so I apologize again.I messaged my self from another account to see if messages on my talk page would ping me. I was not deliberately trying to misleading. For this I apologize. I joined the Vandal cabal on one account, I vow that this was just humor had no intention to be a vandal. I apologize for doing this and if it appeared I harbored bad intent . My actions can be described as Sock puppetry, I was unaware of this phrase and if my actions seem like this then I can only apologize again. I apologize for any bad edits, please bear with me, I am still new. I know that i am in no position to ask for much, but I hope that you may give me a second chance. There are still many articles I want to translate and more I want to edit regarding ancient Chinese history and culture. I have translated, edited and expanded stub articles and would like to continue. I can only ask for an admin to allow me a new start and if it is not to much trouble, delete the other two accounts. I vow never to create another account again, use the other two accounts or appear misleading again. I can assure you that I just want a new start and another chance. I apologize for breaching the rules due to my ignorance. Thank you for you patience. Huaxiazidi (talk) 21:56, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A second chance is certainly possible here- in situation, though, we usually ask that the user refrain from editing under any account or IP for six months, as a show of good faith and to show that the user can abide by policies. 331dot (talk) 12:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot Thank you for reviewing my request. I think that is fair. So does the six months begin now or since when I was blocked? Should I put in another appeal after six months and do I have to do anything in the Six months apart from waiting? Again thank you for your time Huaxiazidi (talk) 17:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Six months from today, please make a new request. 331dot (talk) 17:44, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, No problem, see you in 6 months Huaxiazidi (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]