User talk:Hsluoyz

Npcap also supports NDIS 5, right?

As I remember, you indicated that it could be installed on NT 5 systems, using NDIS 5; if that's true, you might want to mention that in the pcap section on Npcap. Guy Harris (talk) 18:56, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Npcap also supports NDIS 5, right?

In fact, Npcap installer will install the vanilla WinPcap in Windows XP. I don't think it should be viewed as a part of Npcap. It's just Npcap installer includes old WinPcap for convenience. I'm even thinking about removing WinPcap in the installer now, because if a XP user wants to use packet capture feature, he can just use WinPcap. Npcap and its advanced features are for Vista and later users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.136.38.203 (talk) 10:30, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Hsluoyz, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Pcap has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 23:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note to add that the source webpage is released under a GNU General Public License, but not a compatible CC-by license. The GNU license alone is not enough. — Diannaa (talk) 23:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, Hsluoyz, a/k/a Yang Luo, is the main developer of Npcap, so "asking permission" would probably consist of:

"So, Yang, can I copy stuff from the Npcap Web site to Wikipedia?"
"Sure, Yang, go ahead!"

so in this particular case it's probably OK. Guy Harris (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]