User talk:Hromek2000

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Hromek2000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 10:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:46, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright of Image:Vladykaandrei1.jpg

Hi, regarding the listed copyright of Image:Vladykaandrei1.jpg, you are not the copyright holder, the church is, even though you have permission to use it. As such the copyright information on the image page should be changed as such. Thanks!--Kelapstick (talk) 19:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andrei

Just so you know, officially it's Wikipedia's decision to make whether an article should be deleted or not, rather than the church's — but given that in this particular case it went straight to the edit war right after you created the article in the first place, I'm going to speedy delete it as a G7 ("page's only author requests deletion"). There may not only have been one author, strictly speaking, but once we take the WP:BLP war out of the equation you were effectively the only valid author — and so I'll honour your request for removal.

I'm sorry that my stepping in as an administrator wasn't more helpful, but if somebody's got an agenda it can be really hard to stop them. Bearcat (talk) 20:15, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, my instinct on this one is that I'm much more inclined to trust you than KH, especially since skwing had already made several edits that looked very much like KH — even going so far as to make edits to the very same high school where KH teaches. But for neutrality's sake I have to leave all the options open and can't simply assume anything one way or the other until I get confirmation from RFCU. Just be aware that the possibility does exist that it's somebody else entirely — I have no way to easily verify the anonymous IP's alibi, but he does claim to have one. Ah, drama. Such fun. Bearcat (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not surprisingly to me at all, you're in the clear — but the RFCU didn't find a likely relationship between the anonymous IP and skwing either. This doesn't necessarily mean that they're not the same person, for the reason that you identified, but we're not able to confirm that any further at our end. And it does remain possible that somebody else is sticking their nose into things somehow (e.g. KH's wife, or a coworker or acquaintance who's trying to cause trouble for other reasons), although it obviously fails Occam's razor to assume that as the likeliest explanation — so my working hypothesis at this point is going to be that KH didn't think a Wikipedia administrator would be smart enough to look at skwing's edit history or the anonymous IP's physical location. The talk page is now deleted. Bearcat (talk) 17:26, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead?? - Andrei has "died" many times in the past. Yes still lives to drive others mad. Don't buy into the BS. He's a liar and insane. Skwing (talk) 04:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HROMEK2000 - long time, no speak Skwing (talk) 03:02, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]