User talk:Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sudeepgangal, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Guy Macon (talk) 08:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I never used multiple accounts. Yes people who claimed to be my well wishers might have done it. One of them is the paying guest in my apartment.

Want to donate Rs 30,000 in cash

I request Wikipedia to send Some one at my home in Jaipur to collect Rs 30000 in cash as donation from my side.

Hello,

If you want to donate to Wikimedia Founation, use this donation tool. You are also invited to come to the #wikipedia-en-help ^connect to discuss your article, and other problems. Just ask for Soni when you come in.

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir TheOriginalSoni (talk) I have lot of money which i won as awards at national level in India. Moreover Sir i can donate the money right now in cash. If some representative of yours can come to my home and collect it. If it suits Wikipedia lets proceed immediately. Now if it is not suitable then i need to take help of my parents as i am a disabled minor kid and i do not have my credit or debit card. But one thing is very sure, in that case i will donate within 7 days by debit card or credit card or bank transfer. But then i will be able to donate only 10 thousand rupees. Now the ball is in your court sir please let me know your decision. Respected RegardsHridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 14:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I dont think there is any way to collect the money personally, so I suggest you use that link to donate online if you want to.

Also, please join #wikipedia-en-help ^connect

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:26, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir TheOriginalSoni (talk) Ok i will donate 10000 Rs within a week Respected Regards. Sir i also approach you with the due request to take care of article about me as per Wikipedia norms. I will share my apprehensions/suggestions/concerns on the talk page of my article. Respected Sir i had already shared lot of apprehensions/suggestions/concerns on the talk page of my article. Please approve/recommend them to Wikipedia. Respected regardsHridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 15:58, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All the edits which you suggested and had been good enough have been added. Please note that while we appreciate your donation, it will have no difference on your article.

Also, I invite you to join #wikipedia-en-help ^connect

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 16:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected TheOriginalSoni (talk) Sir: I understand the fact that the donation will make no difference to article. And i appreciate this fact very much. Moreover it is my pleasure to donate to Wikipedia. Donating Wikipedia is like serving human fraternity. But Sir i expect WIKIPEDIA to stand by me in the case of my article as per Wikipedia norms. I am sorry and afraid to mention that some suggestions by me have not yet being gone through as i am sure they are very good. Anyway for me the most important factor is the conviction of Wikipedia for the subject Respected Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 16:47, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected TheOriginalSoni (talk) Sir: Finally i have decided to donate Rs 1000 monthly recurring gift forever to Wikipedia. It will be my pleasure to be the supporter of Wikipedia which is like a temple of knowledge having a great team of devoted people who are putting their awesome, pious, never ending, ever increasing efforts and untiring efforts. Salute Wikipedia for keeping itself isolated with commercial aspect for the sake of TRUTH. For your kind information, I had paid Rs 10,000 to Sudeepgangal(One of the Contributor of my article) for donating it to Wikipedia for first 10 months as i do not have any account. I will see to it that the same happens within 48 hours by him.Respected Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 08:34, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please join #wikipedia-en-help ^connect

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 10:45, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tried my level best to donate to Wikipedia with the debit card of Sudeepgangal It failed. Then i tried the same with the debit card of father's fried it failed again. Cards were VISA. Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 16:25, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati! Thank you for your contributions. I am TheOriginalSoni and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! TheOriginalSoni (talk) 13:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir TheOriginalSoni (talk) Thanks from core of my heart Regards. Respected sir i needed it badly Respected Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 14:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarower Sigh Bhati, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for meat puppetry (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sarower Sigh Bhati). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 19:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the outcome of the SPI report, the basis for this block is now sock puppetry.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:12, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Anything you add here which is not specifically a reason why you should be unblocked (and only that) will be removed. Persist in discussing other things and your talk page access will be taken away. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:00, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir: Then what should i do to suggest about the article for the kind inspection of editors. Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 13:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My advice is to go away for six months and ask all your friends/relatives/doctors to stop proxy-editing for you. After six months you can ask for an unblock and state you will only use one account to edit. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir: Then who will give the updates and information about the article. We are happy to be blocked but at least there should be at least one place where we can give our contribution. A place which respected editors would not mind. Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 13:37, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked is blocked. And Wikipedia is not the news. It is not necessary for the article to be updated every single time you are mentioned somewhere. Wikipedia is not your Facebook page. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir: We all want to delete our account forever from Wikipedia, including me For god sake we want to delete every thing related to us. We want to quit Wikipedia officially forever. Do whatever you all want to do with the article. But at least we must quit Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 14:22, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot delete your accounts or your past posts. Just stop editing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:32, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Wikipedia does not delete accounts. See the section "Deleting and merging accounts" at WP:UNC. Also, given the disruption you have caused, what's called vanishing is highly unlikley to be allowed. Best thing would be for you just to stop trying to edit here.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sirs: Even the article lacks lot of information like 12 players , 60 players circular chess etc. How will my contribution will be taken as only i can contribute for same. Respected Sir agreed Wikipedia is not news but what about those developments which will have effect on article. Suppose I die etc. Something happens which is must for article to include. BLOCKED MEANS BLOCKED IS FINE WITH US. No issues for same, we all are happy with it and at peace. The only issue that remains is that Article is related with me and insulating the article 100% from me is very difficult to understand. Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 14:48, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most biographical articles at Wikipedia are updated without any input from the subject, his family, his associates, or his friends. In many ways it's better like that because the articles are generally far more neutral as a result. Some article subjects have a tougher time distancing themselves from articles about themselves than others. I'm afraid you'll have to let go. If six months from now, you still want input to the article and you realy believe you can comply with Wikipedia's policies, then you can at that time request an unblock of the master account per WP:SO.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sir: Can subject of the article apply for deletion of the article. If so what is the procedure Sir Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 15:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC) Moreover Sir: Is it possible that the biographical article can be formed without taking into account the concerns of the subject of the article : Errors , Incomplete information , etc Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 15:17, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The policy is here: WP:BIODEL. However as the article is not poorly sourced and multiple newspapers/magazines have profiled you, the article is unlikely to be deleted through a discussion at WP:AFD. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:20, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respected Sirs: I went to WP:BIODEL But i am not able to edit Now what should i do Regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 02:15, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Further Sir: I tried to open a new section at WP:AFD But unable to edit there also. Is there any way left out to say good bye to Wikipedia forever regards Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati (talk) 02:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RIP

RIP Sharouser (talk) 07:17, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]