User talk:Hr5accsaz

Welcome!

Hello, Hr5accsaz, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Rejoy²⁰⁰³(talk) 05:46, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Talk Page Etiquette

Hey Hr5accsaz, this is a gentle (but firm) warning on your commenting behavior at Talk:Stockton Rush. Wikipedia's guidelines on talk pages clearly state that an article's talk page is a space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article. You already replied saying that you're not advocating for any changes to the article. It is also inappropriate to repeatedly restate the same lengthy arguments during a discussion (see WP:BLUDGEON). I get that it's frustrating when other editors disagree with you or seem to not understand your point, but it's important that discussions can end when a clear consensus has formed, even (and especially) if the outcome isn't the one you wanted.

I am glad you're enthusiastic; that's a great thing for an editor! However, I recommend taking a break from this discussion. There are plenty of areas on Wikipedia which would benefit from your knowledge and participation. The Task Center linked above is a great place to start. I am also happy to provide help and answer any questions you might have. I'm now watching this talk page, so feel free to reply here if there's anything I can help with. Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for your enthusiasm so far, and I hope that you enjoy your time here! Dylnuge ^{(Talk • Edits)} 04:08, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Your recent editing history at Stockton Rush shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – bradv 14:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Hr5accsaz reported by User:Bradv (Result: ). Thank you. – bradv 01:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Stockton Rush) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 04:41, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Exemption 4 Hr5accsaz (talk) 05:18, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hr5accsaz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Continual vandalism by editors without reaching a consensus in Talk (such as by utilizing WP:PA in talk in order to discourage editing that conflicts with their POV e.g. "go elsewhere, because you don't know what 'engineer' means, we don't agree with you") vs. establishing a consensus in talk, and before removing clarifying edits that would otherwise improve the accuracy, reliability, and ease of use of the article for the reader (i.e. what kind of "engineer" and under what entity?).Hr5accsaz (talk) 05:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please review WP:NOTTHEM and reflect upon the fact that a new editor focusing on a single topic may not be in a position to explain procedures to others. Johnuniq (talk) 06:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reviewing administrator will be interested in Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Hr5accsaz reported by User:Bradv (Result: Page-blocked indefinite). Izno (talk) 06:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]