User talk:HowlingAngel

Lipman

Hello. Not sure what's happened here, as you just blanked your own talk page. In any event, as I said right before you blanked your own page, No idea what you are talking about here, Howling. I am not him, never met him. This is an edit that provides very selected examples of work based only on episodes that are of clear national interest, such as Sandy Hook, Virginia Tech, Columbine, Ft. Hood, etc. There are over 300 interviews with him by my count, and this is a tiny subset, all based on national significance, and all cited themselves in Wikipedia. All of the citations are to independent sources, such as CNN, The Washington Post, etc., as used throughout Wikipedia. The citations are written just as is suggested in the correct example in WPPEACOCK. I appreciate your work, though I wonder why you blanked your page immediately after I wrote this once. Best regards.

UPDATE: Actually, you read my mind--HA! I just redid the edit, removing any possible WPPEACOCK adjective "Prominent" etc. I also removed an entire section, "Work in Law", which, on upon further reflection after your suggestions, was redundant. Thanks for you help, and have a fine morning, and a good, if invisible cup o' tea. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.55.217.6 (talk) 09:37, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Robb Article

The article Doug Robb, is not linked correctly in other languages. Should be removed , or link it properly. Danasking (talk) 21:04, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 23:09, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persondata

Deprecated persondata being removed by bots and users as per this decision and this RFC. Quis separabit? 04:11, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I feel like we have the same goal- curing boredom. Lazylaces (Talk to me) 05:58, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"possible vandalism or good-faith edit"

With an edit summary as informative as this, you might as well not bother filling it in. Better would be to write informative edit summaries, of course. (FWIW, this particular edit is obviously and unambiguously not vandalism.) --JBL (talk) 16:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, HowlingAngel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, HowlingAngel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]