User talk:Howekung
Howekung, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Howekung! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 17 April 2019 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for December 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of New Zealand records in swimming, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Hunter. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
[edit]
Your recent editing history at List of New Zealand records in swimming shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 08:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
The information you removed were being added to the page for more than 7.5 years, earliest record can date back to May 2014 for the long course mixed relay section by Montell 74. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_New_Zealand_records_in_swimming&oldid=609766605#Mixed_relay Recently I just added a reference from FINA - the governing association of swimming to that section, and add another section for short course mix medley. @DerbyCountyinNZ: You have removed the wrong section which has been existed for years.
Disambiguation link notification for July 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Hong Kong records in athletics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gold Coast.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
List of Hong Kong records in swimming
[edit]Please note ratification procedure before editing. Thanks. Montell 74 (talk) 12:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- If you check the record published by HKASA, by the day I edited the association already update the latest records (Ref: https://www.hkgswimming.org.hk/zh-hant/viewfile/?file=dXBsb2FkL3RlbXBsYXRlLzUzNC9wZGZfZmlsZXNfMi82MmQ2M2RlYTc2ZWVmLnBkZg==), so I don't understand why you undid by edit, thanks for your attention. Howekung (talk) 14:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Hongkong swimming records
[edit]Hello Howekung. Why do you not consider ratification procedure by HKASA? Montell 74 (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Your standard for what considers as "ratified" is too strict compare with majority of the users, if the association has added the record to their record list, there's no reason for you to wait for the official "ratified" confirmation. Please stop keep on undoing different national record pages. Howekung (talk) 06:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Too strict?? Please have a look at the official record list. Association mentions explicitly that new marks awaiting ratification. Please stop ignore this.Montell 74 (talk) 09:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- From what I see among pages of different national records, seems you are the only user that like to undo different edits add those "ratify" signs to records, basically all other users will just replace with the old time, and I can't see that you will check regularly on different federation websites to update the status afterwards. Furthermore, for the case that I edit (Hong Kong Swimming Record), if you pay attention to the national federation website, you may notice that that "waiting for official ratify" is only a symbolic thing, they won't update that until new records are broken, so I wonder why you need to struggle on such minor issues. Howekung (talk) 06:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Illogical. When HKASA mentions it "symbolically", I wonder why the vast majority of records are ratified.
- You should have noticed that a large number of records are not ratified for various reasons. Unfortunately, your "majority" does not take this into account and misinformation remains. Montell 74 (talk) 21:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- From what I see among pages of different national records, seems you are the only user that like to undo different edits add those "ratify" signs to records, basically all other users will just replace with the old time, and I can't see that you will check regularly on different federation websites to update the status afterwards. Furthermore, for the case that I edit (Hong Kong Swimming Record), if you pay attention to the national federation website, you may notice that that "waiting for official ratify" is only a symbolic thing, they won't update that until new records are broken, so I wonder why you need to struggle on such minor issues. Howekung (talk) 06:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- Who is the "majority"? Please note the special abbrevation (#) for unratified records in legend. This is what the "majority" has to consider. Otherwise feel free to discuss on talk page.Montell 74 (talk) 09:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
- Too strict?? Please have a look at the official record list. Association mentions explicitly that new marks awaiting ratification. Please stop ignore this.Montell 74 (talk) 09:25, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 1
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eudice Chong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anastasia Tikhonova.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)