User talk:Howchou

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Howchou! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 ^talk 15:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Qingchuan Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanyang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chu River and Han Street

Just wanted to say thank you for all the beautiful photos you added to the Chu River and Han Street article. I think they really enhance the article and make it much easier to understand and appreciate this project. Great work! — Hebrides (talk) 08:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I happened to have photos taken when I was touring that street. Hope you can come to see it some day!Howchou (talk) 14:56, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. When you recently edited Wuhan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jianghan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Line 6, Chongqing Rail Transit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Line 4, Wuhan Metro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hongshan District (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wuhan Poly Plaza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wuchang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rail_map_of_China图有小差错

Rail_map_of_China图有小差错，wuhan（武汉）到jiujiang（九江）应为灰色普通铁路，而jiujiang（九江）到nanchang（南昌）应在加上与现有灰色普通铁路平行的昌九城际的绿色线。请问你SVG文件用的什么软件制作的？ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enyiths (talk • contribs) 11:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I used iDraw.--Howchou (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wuhan Baishazhou Yangtze River Bridge

Hello. You have a new message at Talk:Wuhan Baishazhou Yangtze River Bridge's talk page. Message added ShakyIsles (talk) 01:13, 15 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Luojia College, Wuhan University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Private college and Hongshan District

Chutian College Hubei Agricultural University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Private college

Hankou University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Private college

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MU WUH-SFO

Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content (bullet #7). Same plane but the flight passes through a domestic hub (PVG). Therefore those destinations cannot be listed. Please take to the talk page if you disagree. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 02:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

okay, i got it.--Howchou (talk) 02:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have readded it with a source stating that it is the same plane, same flight number (and passengers originating from WUH going to SFO do not get off plane or change aircraft at PVG). I would still discuss it though. I'll just leave it for now until we can figure out if the flight is considered "timetable direct" or the aircraft changes constantly. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 05:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Better to be on the safe side, I have removed it again. Will take to the respective talk pages if necessary (WUH, SFO, and WP:AIRPORTS). Do not want to get into any edit wars. 68.119.73.36 (talk) 05:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yingwuzhou Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hanyang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wuhan University College of Chinese Language and Literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graduate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wuhan Metro Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WHU

Wuhan University is a Chinese university with historical and cultural importance, that is why I think contents added to this article should be especially deliberated. For example, Yellow Crane Tower may be notable, but that doesn't mean it's important enough to have a long paragraph from the article China. To list all those rankings from 2002 is obviously against WP:WEIGHT. What's more, both Wu Shulian and CUAA rankings, their methodologies are fairly opaque. Wu Shulian has listed Zhejiang Uni as the top university of China for many years, that must be a great joke. So they may be notable, but they're not reliable.

If you carefully examined my edits, you'll find I not only remove some content, but also updated the data, and added a link to the current president Li Xiaohong. You yourself removed legit and useful content added by other editors, too. To be polite is important, but to improve the article is more important. If you feel offended, I apologize. I have no question to ask, I barely give my answer here. Thanks for your note. Regards--Huang Jinghai (talk) 13:06, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize again that I didn't start this discussion earlier. Yes, I'm Chinese and as you know, I'm not fluent in English. But I prefer to leave the message in English so that other English wikipedians can also understand our conversations.

I admit I am somtimes tendentious, but I have never edited pages purely on my own judgment. I know that all rankings have their shorts, but it is precisely because their popularity do they attract criticism. However, that's not the point. According to Alexa, the site shanghairanking.com is ranked 47,090th globally[1], cuaa.net 636,424th[2]. Overlook also that most pages of cuaa.net are NOT directly related to university rankings. It's very clear that their influence are not at the same level. Wu Shulian has not even an official site. The search results on Baidu are meaningless, since many results are from blogs and forums.

To introduce an university and a kindergarten with the same length in one single article is not neutral. In fact, you will see that no kindergarten appears in articles about cities, although some kindergarten may be notable itself. If you insist to put Wu Shulian and cuaa rankings in the WHU article, I suggest to keep only the rankings in 2014. Or, remove all the rankings.--Huang Jinghai (talk) 02:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your understanding. I may update the WHU article in the future, your further comments are welcome --Huang Jinghai (talk) 01:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

/x/

I recommend checking out this thread. I'm having doubts about [wuxan].

Peter ^Isotalo 00:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Peter. I think it would be better if you can clear your doubts first, either by getting help on the thread you mentioned or finding a source (a paper or a book) that can back up your contentions, than go directly editing the page, since you seemed not certain about this yourself.--Howchou (talk) 04:58, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm fairly sure of this. I studied Chinese in both high school and college and I've been nerding phonetics for close to a decade. I recognize [xu] and [xɤ], but [xan] sounds wrong. And I'm saying that as someone who grew up with Russian, which has very clear [xa] syllables. There's also this this pointer in Standard Chinese phonology. The source[3] you gave in your edit comment isn't a reliable one.

Revert at Wuhan if you feel you're in the right, but I'm not sure it's the best pronunciation guide.

Peter ^Isotalo 08:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The source might be unreliable, but I did find other source pointing at the same direction. What I hope to clarify here is, if you can find a source to buttress your finding, that would be perfect. But if not, Wikipedia is probably not the best place for an original idea. I am not talking from my own scholarly training on linguistics, even though I have some at both college and graduate level.--Howchou (talk) 10:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note the ref to Duanmu pointing to variation in pronunciation of /x/. That's not my addition.

Peter ^Isotalo 10:21, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Some speakers pronounce it [h]." I can make the exact opposite argument, arguendo, saying that "other people pronounce it [x]." My personal experience with the pronunciation of "Wuhan" is [wuxan] because it is a location name, not just any noun, and it tends to be pronounced more clearly. I would recommend you finding a native Chinese speaker and ask him/her how to pronounce "Wuhan," and see if it is [wuxan] or [wuhan].--Howchou (talk) 11:42, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Whmetro-logo

Template:Whmetro-logo has been nominated for merging with Template:Rail-interchange. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use {{ping|Jc86035}} to reply to me 04:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Whmetro-logo

Template:Whmetro-logo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk • contribs) Use {{re|Jc86035}} to reply to me 15:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

China railway map projection?

HI. I'm trying to figure out what map projection you're using in the railway map. Is it a custom projection?

Thanks very much.

Andjames26 (talk) 05:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)andjames26[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Howchou. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Duke Kunshan University Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Duke Kunshan University Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Double First Class University Plan

Hi, I'm Lineslarge. Howchou, thanks for creating Double First Class University Plan!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article is an orphan

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Lineslarge (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Howchou. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Howchou. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wuhan Zall Football Club.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wuhan Zall Football Club.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm Cfls. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wuhan University, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cfls (talk) 07:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cfls:You can simply mark them with a template^{[unreliable source?]} or flag the section you deemed problematic. Directly removing huge chunks of text is not very helpful and unconstructive.--08:59, 7 January 2024 (UTC)Howchou (talk)[reply]

Please refrain from linking Wuhan University's origins to the Ziqiang Academy established in 1893. This historical association is currently a subject of significant national controversy, including objections from within the university's own faculty. Due to ongoing debates, primary sources from Wuhan University may not provide an impartial perspective on this matter and should be avoided with caution. Cfls (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand there was a debate, but at least we can include the details of such debate. Not allowing mentioning such debate was rather authoritarian isn't it? Howchou (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The policies WP:PRIMARY and WP:NOTADVERT are fundamental and non-negotiable aspects of Wikipedia's guidelines. There are no exceptions to these rules. Cfls (talk) 22:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's important to accurately represent Chinese universities, including Wuhan University, without applying the subjective and unofficial label of "research university." In China, there's no formal classification or accreditation for this term by the Ministry of Education or other authoritative bodies. This is true not just for prominent institutions like Tsinghua University and Peking University, but also for other universities such as the Southern University of Science and Technology and Shanghai Dianji University. While some individual rankings might label these institutions as "research universities" for ranking classification purposes, these designations lack a standardized, well-recognized, and due process of evaluation and are therefore arbitrary. It's crucial to avoid using this term when discussing Chinese universities and colleges to maintain accuracy and objectivity. The rule of WP:BOOSTER is strictly enforced Wikipedia-wide. Cfls (talk) 21:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To ensure compliance with Wikipedia's WP:BOOSTER, WP:NOT, and WP:NOTADVERT policies, please avoid characterizing Wuhan University with subjective or promotional descriptions such as "The university is known for research in fields such as the social sciences, remote sensing, survey engineering, Library & Information Science, and hydraulic engineering" or as "one of the often-mentioned 'Four Great Universities' of the Republic of China". These policies strictly prohibit subjective or promotional content. This rule is mandatory and non-negotiable, and applies universally to all universities, including globally recognized institutions like Stanford University. Wikipedia's commitment is to maintain objectivity, ensuring that university entries serve as informative resources rather than resembling admissions handbooks or marketing brochures. Cfls (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Wuhan University, without citing a non-primary, reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources. Thank you. Cfls (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Howchou. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Wuhan University, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. I just redirect all but one of the departments of that university: they are rarely notable in their own right, and these articles had no secondary coverage that made them notable. But I can't help but wonder what your connection to that university is. Drmies (talk) 21:36, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wuhan University Faculty of Social Sciences has been nominated for merging

Category:Wuhan University Faculty of Social Sciences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wuhan University Faculty of Medical Sciences has been nominated for merging

Category:Wuhan University Faculty of Medical Sciences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:40, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wuhan University Faculty of Humanities has been nominated for merging

Category:Wuhan University Faculty of Humanities has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:41, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]