User talk:HowardFrampton
 | This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of JohnHarold (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |  |
Not all blocked
[edit]JohnHarold, the administrator concluded that you were acting without malice. Your User:JohnHarold has not been blocked. —SlamDiego←T 05:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
The article Bilepton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Page created by a blocked sock of the subject's discoverer, Paul Frampton. This is a hypothetical particle that lacks a particularly convincing notability claim. There are some scientific papers regarding the subject, but I struggle to find one that is not 1) associated with or authored by Frampton and 2) trivial coverage of the subject.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)