User talk:House1630

Any questions ?

The Ratskeller in Bremen

Hi! The article on The Ratskeller in Bremen has been restored following the discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 July 25. Please accept my apology on behalf of Wikipedia for its incorrect deletion. --Stormie (talk) 23:27, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Chase-Manh1966.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chase-Manh1966.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 06:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moshe Pearlman

The article Moshe Pearlman has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — Bill william compton^Talk 14:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there!

I am here to say that your tagging on many of my recently created articles as "irrelevant location" was wrong. Per Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Places, these articles should be included on the encyclopedia. I shall be reverting your edits. Thank you! ⇒T A P 18:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I and numerous editors can confirm this. Populated places covered in the national censuses are by a long margin generally considered notable subjects. And I think you'd be surprised how much could potentially be written about local villages in Turkey and how interesting they could actually be, not to mention valuable if can be researched.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Dr. Blofeld is right. This has been the convention pretty much since Wikipedia's inception. Even small villages appear in multiple, independent reliable sources, in the form of national census databases, address databases, and the map data of multiple mapping providers.

Many small villages in, for example, the UK, actually have surprisingly long and detailed articles: all it needs is a little research by someone with local knowledge. An example (the very first article I clicked on at random from Category:Villages in Lincolnshire) is Bigby, Lincolnshire which, with a population of only 234, has an excellent article.

There's no reason why the same can't be done for a small village in Turkey. A stub article provides a starting point for such an article. -- The Anome (talk) 19:57, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic competitors

Hi! Please see WP:NOLYMPICS, perhaps you can remove the tags you have added to the Olympians? Kind regards Doma-w (talk) 20:53, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have 7 days - time enough to expand the article. --House1630 (talk) 20:58, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer Doma-w (talk) 21:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paula Becker House for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paula Becker House is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Becker House until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jac16888 ^Talk 15:31, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Veit Stoss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Court auction

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Court auction. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreclosure#Foreclosure_auction. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreclosure#Foreclosure_auction – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Midhart90 (talk) 01:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of renewable energy companies by stock exchange, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FWB (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Walter H. Breen

Hello! There seems to be some confusion between Breen's books supporting pederasty (published in the mid 60s) and Breen's trials on charges of child molestation (1990 and 1991). Was there also a trial regarding Breen's book? Zentomologist (talk) 21:51, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's the question. I don't know. --House1630 (talk) 09:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cities with millions of inhabitants

Category:Cities with millions of inhabitants, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. S/s/a/z-1/2 (talk) 06:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. The thread is Socketpuppets detected in Germany. Thank you. Murph9000 (talk) 11:26, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, House1630. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, House1630. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Applied Solar

The article Applied Solar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources, and timeline is a fever dream. Founded in 2005, listed on NASDAQ in 2004, changed name in 2009, filed for Chapter 11 in 2002 and Chapter 7 in 2010, and was distributing casino bonuses by 2019.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]