User talk:Hoshi no hate

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Saikano (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Re: Higurashi Daybreak image

You put an image from Higurashi Daybreak on the Higurashi no Naku Koro ni Rei article, so I removed it from that article. If you want, add it to the Daybreak article (if you haven't already).--十八 22:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nijikon move to Wiktionary

I agree, it's just a dictionary definition at present, and I don't think it will grow from there. I marked it with a template for a move to Wiktionary. --Albert Tellier 18:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Controversial Anime

List of Controversial Anime, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of Controversial Anime satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Controversial Anime and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of Controversial Anime during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — iridescent (talk to me!) 19:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Controversial Anime and List of Live Action Anime

Both these pages have been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Controversial Anime. While we welcome your contributions, please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policies — particularly WP:IINFO and WP:OWN — before you continue to create similar pages. Thank you. — iridescent (talk to me!) 21:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Azumanga a sockpuppet? Prove it

Where? The only articles I have posted are under "azumanga1" -- I have never used other accounts or IP address; on a couple occasions I have posted under my IP by accident when I forgot to log in. In addition, I have various friends who are Wiki editors who'll vouch for me. Anyway, show me where I am a sock. -- azumanga 16:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoshi no hate (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

look at my edits! THEY ARE ALL USEFUL AND MOST HAD NO COMPLAINTS! BE FAIR PEOPLE! PLEASE!

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason you were blocked which is that you are yet another abusive sockpuppet of the blocked vandal, Saikano. Each time you create a new account to avoid your block, you prove once again that it would be inappropriate to unblock you. — Yamla 17:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[edit conflict]:Your edits have indeed attracted complaints - see the above deletion discussion/vote pages. You seem to be ignorant of what constitutes an appropriate Wikipedia article, and that's why you have been blocked for disruption - multiple times. Request to unblock denied. - Mike Rosoft 17:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saikano, I don't need to ask who this is. You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia with a multitude of accounts, which no administrators are willing to unblock. This effectively means that you are not welcome to create new accounts. I received your email, and you seem to have continued to operate in violation of Wikipedia's policies. I see no reason to unblock your main, and so I am blocking this sockpuppet account. Leebo ^T/C 17:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]