User talk:Horses In The Sky

Regarding the image Image:1010 Sanjay Gandhi.jpg

Hi. Saw that you uploaded this image, without specifying the source for where it was found. As the source is needed to determine the correct license, the image is now tagged as no-source, which means that it will be deleted in about a week unless the source is specified. Also, if you'd like some help in determining the various licenses, feel free to ask at my talkpage! Bjelleklang - talk 11:14, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, added the source and fixed the license so the image won't be deleted. Bjelleklang - talk 17:04, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Against Scientology templates

Do not circumvent the deletion review or the deletion. If you disagree that's fine but created a template that is solely a link (obviously no) and then another template which is more of the same but worse isn't going to help. Go to deletion review and talk about it. Or use one of the other means of communication, but don't do what you did. gren グレン 11:44, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The template was deleted under speedy criterion by an admin and you tried to bypass that. The proper place to deal with it is deletion review. I don't exactly think all of the admins get along, although maybe you haven't noticed the proliferation of wheel wars lately. In any case the goal is not to promote free speech, it's to write an encyclopedia. For other established policies limiting free speech here see: WP:NPA, WP:CIV, WP:NLT, and WP:HAR. gren グレン 12:06, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, They aren't governed by WP:NPOV. They are definitely governed by policies that users are governed by. That is why I linked those policies above. The reasoning of it being an attack page is probably controversial, however, civility is another reason why some users feel it should be deleted. In attempting to create a good working environment with all you don't want to create tension editors by attacking their faith / religion / ethnicity / etc. User pages are meant to help out with the encyclopedic effort. There is a great degree of leniency but the idea of templates in the forms of attacks have been grounds for admins deleting things. Tony Sidaway said when he deleted it that templates would be deleted but he wouldn't go so far as to remove the material from users pages. I don't think I would either. The issue is categories and templates institutionalizing certain ideologies. For they are not in the user space even if they are displayed there. gren グレン 12:26, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, with your images Image:DSC 0326.jpg and Image:CharlieMorgan.JPG, want me to delete the low resolution one? Or, rename or whatnot? no sense in having two of the same image. gren グレン 12:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Hi, I noticed that you created the userbox Template:User against Saud. Obviously the legitimacy of the userbox is under dsicussion, but what is not under discussion is our copyright policy. You may not use images tagged as 'fair use' in userspace or tamplates. Please read WP:FUC and WP:FU before inserting any more images into wikipedia. I assume that you were not aware of this policy. --Doc ^ask? 22:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Same goes for Template:User Chavez, and the corresponding image on your userpage. --Doc ^ask? 22:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Arkan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arkan.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 05:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Moon_under_water.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Moon_under_water.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 17:04, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Paul_McGarr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Paul_McGarr.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 23:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Yvon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yvon.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 09:11, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use image

Hello! I noticed that you had Image:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad drawings.jpg shown on your user page. The image is uploaded under a fair use provision, and Wikipedia policy states that fair use images should not be displayed on any pages outside the main (article) namespace, including user pages. Would you mind removing the image or simply linking to it? (Add a ":" in from of the image, like this: [[:Image:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad drawings.jpg]]) Thanks a lot! Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:19, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A Western Sahara-related vote

===>Here Make your voice heard. Vote or die. And all that. -Justin (koavf), talk 20:27, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment

Please comment on my counteroffer on the talk page of Doc's userbox proposal. --Dragon695 05:51, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delegado Zero

This is in response to your comment on my talk page. No, I think it is normal and accepted to translate something like Delegado Zero to Delegate Zero on the english-language Wikipedia site. I also do not know if you are right that after Subcommandante Marcos changes his public name to Delegado Zero that we are supposed to "merge" the two into a single article. That's okay if you disagree with me, but I do not think you should state so strongly that you are right without referencing your comments with a Wikipedia guidelines or something. DanielM 22:23, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I find it somewhat arrogant of you to delete the Delegate Zero page and all the information on it without discussing it on that page first. DanielM 22:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I did see your link to the Wikipedia guideline that talks about redirects of alternative names. You backed up your position some now, so okay about the redirect part. In my opinion it may be appropriate to flip the redirects and make Delegate/Delegado Zero the primary article. That is the name he goes by now. I realize that this would require some work on the article and could be something of a jarring change, so I am not saying that has to be tackled now. Maybe after he has been known by that name for a while. DanielM 23:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seborga

OK, thanks... I've missed that part. CapPixel 10:09, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yedinstvo

Thanks for the kind words! Russian political parties have always been prone to splitting into small groups quarreling over arcane issues. I would be surprised if anybody other than professional historians still remembered all these splits a hundred years after the fact. Keeping track of who offended whom, why the "recallists" expelled Alexander Bogdanov in 1911 and who Alexander Guchkov fought a duel with is an absolute nightmare, but I am trying to add this stuff to WP as time permits :) Ahasuerus 22:51, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Reading burning 2005.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Reading burning 2005.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:07, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily deleted template

Hello Horses In The Sky. Please note that I've deleted {{User against Saud 2}} under Criteria for speedy deletion T1 ("divisive and inflammatory"). Expressing a desire for large-scale executions may be offensive to many users, particularly that of a royal family. If you would like to contest this decision, please see deletion review. // [admin] Pathoschild (^talk/_map) 17:11, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chechnya

There are dozens of 'states' in the same position as Chechnya which do not qualify, so why should it? Chechnya has a secessionist movement which has proven to be unsuccessful like so many other movements--this does not qualify it for status as an unrecognized state. OZLAWYER talk 18:18, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See List of active autonomist and secessionist movements for the many secessionist movements around the world. Also, as far as I know, there is not any appreciable autonomy in Chechnya. No more than many Russian federal republics, and less than some others. OZLAWYER talk 21:40, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:474626067 l.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:474626067 l.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fallout boy 23:11, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comments on Current events

Hello Horses In The Sky –

I'm trying to get some discussion going on two proposals regarding the current events page, but so far have gotten little to no response. Since you have recently edited the current events page, I'm asking for your input on these two proposals:

One proposal (this is the big one) involves putting the daily events from the current events pages into article-templates, a lá the monthly pages from 2003 to 2005, as well and having a consistent number of recent days on the current events page instead of a monthly archive. This would allow for the current events page and the respective month pages to be updated simultaneously without the monthly archival. For more, see the current events talk page.

Another proposal involves merging the content of the regional current events pages (such as British and Irish current events and Canadian current events) into fewer continental articles. For more, see the current events WikiProject talk page.

Your input on one or both of these issues would be appreciated. joturn e r 22:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Reply from Holywarrior)

It looks bold my friend,a repellent against bhurabal vandalism.any query do ask.thanx.Holywarrior 08:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question

I noticed you said "but this is a sad day indeed, the one thing the world does not need is more nations and it is a shame to see the dream of a multi-ethnic state finally collapse to the rampant power of sectarianism" about the independance of Montenegro, but also state in your user page that you want to see an independant Kurdistan and Western Saharra. Is there any reason that you view these as different? Rangeley 02:02, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for the barnstar. I really haven't done all that much work on People's Republic of Hungary but I intend to do more soon. Thanks for the encouragement though. -- TheMightyQuill 13:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Carshalton Plan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carshalton Plan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:DSC00108.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:DSC00108.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image:DSC00122.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:DSC00122.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

These both are orphan images. They need to be linked to articles to be on Wikipedia or they need to be moved to Commons -Thanks Nv8200p talk 19:48, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See item #4 at WP:ISNOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_mirror_or_a_repository_of_links.2C_images.2C_or_media_files -Nv8200p talk 19:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Communism

Hi there! Take a look at the newly-created Portal:Communism and make the contributions and suggestions you want. Thanks! Afonso Silva 09:11, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:National flag.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:National flag.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nicke L 17:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World's Smallest Political Quiz userbox

You may be interested in User:Audacity/Userboxes/WSPQ, which is a replacement for the old Political Chart userbox. The new userbox takes the two variables (economic and personal freedom), calculates which political alignment they place you into (Statist, Libertarian, Liberal, Centrist, or Conservative), and links your userpage to the appropriate category.

Please reply to User talk:Audacity, as I will not be watching your talk page. Λυδαcιτγ 07:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RPPflag.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:RPPflag.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 13:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wuthering Heights.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wuthering Heights.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 13:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pkk logo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pkk logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Pkk logo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Pkk logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Annelise_hesme.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Annelise_hesme.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 08:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Moon under water.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Moon under water.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 21:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carshalton Plan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carshalton Plan.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nepali Congress.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Nepali Congress.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Nepal-Communist.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:Nepal-Communist.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Nepal-Communist.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. P4k (talk) 01:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSC00133.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:DSC00133.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:25, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 0282.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0282.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG 0115.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0115.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nepali Congress.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Nepali Congress.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:37, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Nepal Protest.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nepal Protest.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:14, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BSP Crowd.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of United Nicaraguan Opposition

The article United Nicaraguan Opposition has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unsourced permastub: WP:TNT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Dissident Aggressor 23:11, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Nepal Police.jpg

The file File:Nepal Police.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Template:User Nepal Maoists

Template:User Nepal Maoists, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Nepal Maoists and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User Nepal Maoists during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Nepal Communism table.JPG

The file File:Nepal Communism table.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low-res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 12:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]