User talk:Horse Eye's Back/Archives/2024/September

JD Vance "couch thing"

Hey mate, I saw that you also supported restoring this section, so I wanted to point you toward the official vote now that they've opened one up: Talk:JD_Vance#rfc_B26536C. Cheers! Enix150 (talk) 18:48, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Hello, I'm Ahri Boy. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Let administrators deal with bad people you encounter. Ahri Boy (talk) 00:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC) Retracting. Ahri Boy (talk) 16:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

@Ahri Boy: you appear to have used a user warning for harassment? Who are you formally alledging that I have harassed? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

The anonymous Hindutva activist you attacked before. It would be best not to make a rhetoric against bad people on-wiki. Ahri Boy (talk) 06:43, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

@Ahri Boy: in what way was my comment an attack? Also note that the template you used is not for a personal attack, its for harassment. I also don't get how what I said would be a personal attack but calling the same editor "bad people" is not a personal attack... That actually seems worse, I was factual and descriptive while you appear to be judgemental and emotional. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:11, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Lori Mattix edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.