User talk:Horse Eye's Back/Archives/2021/March
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Horse Eye's Back. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks
Thank you so much for your comments on Kiengir's talkpage. It was getting to the point where I wondered if it was me going mad. Anyway, cheers, I hope the user will reflect on your comments. I certainly am thinking about the way I would handle a similar conversation in future. Boynamedsue (talk) 18:26, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Mass deletion on 1987 Lieyu massacre on March 7
You have engaged in an edit war according to the continuous mass deletion repeated on 1987 Lieyu massacre. Users are expected to collaborate with others to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeating malicious sabotage of mass deletion. Please note:
1. The legal references were listed for the concerned officials and population who still refuse to recognize the responsibility and international laws, then continuously defend the causes of operations as legitimate as per the serious arguments till today.
2. Edit war is disruptive with the mass deletion manipulated for the further operation. Wikipedia is not the place for espionage warfare, especially started with an anonymous account to launch a cover-up operation.
3. It appears that more alt accounts will be set up to proceed further cover-up operation. It's really low to cheat the public by cutting off the legal references and evidences in a real life case even with the belief as justifiable as per certain ideology.
Please use the article's talk page for controversial changes consensus before engaging the editing wars. You can post at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. It may be more appropriate to request temporary page protection. Engaging in an edit war may lead to account being blocked again. Mickie-Mickie (talk) 16:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is about you edit warring over that ludicrously long and convoluted See also section the IP removed, right? Didn’t I just place a warning about that on your talk page [1]? And didn’t you remove that warning without addressing it [2]? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Happy St. Patrick's Day
Happy St. Patrick's Day! I hope your St. Patrick's Day is enjoyable and safe. Hopefully next year there will be more festive celebrations. Best wishes from Los Angeles. // Timothy :: talk |
Review
Can you please read over WP:BRD again. By your recent edit summaries you seem to be confused about how the process works.--Moxy- 03:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- The BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (BRD) is an optional method of reaching consensus... One that in general I do not follow. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 14:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should re-evaluate your approach bring it more in line with what the community does. Experience editor after experience editor has raised concerns about your general approach and understanding of consensus-building. Should take heed of what others are pointing out to you.Moxy- 18:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- "Experience editor after experience editor has raised concerns about your general approach and understanding of consensus-building.” no they haven’t... If you think that BRD is binding or required then you are not in line with the community. I would also note that many of those who thump BRD do not follow it themselves, you will consistently find me on talk pages hammering out a consensus when a conflict arrises. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Just keep in mind that most are not fans of the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, revert, revert.--Moxy- 21:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should re-evaluate your approach bring it more in line with what the community does. Experience editor after experience editor has raised concerns about your general approach and understanding of consensus-building. Should take heed of what others are pointing out to you.Moxy- 18:58, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Since you commented
Since you commented on the ANI thread you are aware of Talk:Arab states–Israeli alliance against Iran, any help at mediating the disputes there would be very appreciated (if you have time). Best wishes from Los Angeles. // Timothy :: talk 17:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- I think today’s brief reminder of how toxic that topic space is has been enough for me, you are braver then I attempting to mediate among so many hard heads. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--WikiwiLimeli (talk) 08:02, 8 March 2021 (UTC)