User talk:Hoots Hagis Kilts Porridge

This page is currently protected from editing to prevent Hoots Hagis Kilts Porridge (talk · contribs · block log · arb · SPI) from using it to make disruptive edits, such as abusing the {{unblock}} template.
If you cannot edit this user talk page and you need to make a change or leave a message, you can request an edit, request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Ckatz^chat_spy 04:01, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoots Hagis Kilts Porridge (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My previous edits were on the Scots wiki; I have done nothing wrong here. Even so, my previous articles on the Scots version contained some truth and accuracy. Keep my block on the Scots version, if that is your wish, but allow me to assist the English version in its prosperity. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I have reviewed your contributions, and was not able to find evidence that an unblock of this account would be likely to make the encyclopedia better. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:00, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock| Was it not written in the Bible that God gives second chances; take, for example, the parable of the fig tree (Luke 13: 6 - 9 ). Come on, give a Scotsman a second chance; I didn't even ''blatantly'' vandalise anything. Alright, so I added some humour to mine writing; was this such a condemnable act? I can even use correct punctuation, unlike most users. Anyway, I leave mine humble fate into your hands.}}[[User:Hoots Hagis Kilts Porridge|Hoots Hagis Kilts Porridge]] ([[User talk:Hoots Hagis Kilts Porridge#top|talk]]) 18:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

If you have something legitimate and genuine to say about why you should be unblocked, feel free. But don't abuse the unblock template to post disingenuous sarcasm. Equazcion ^(talk) 18:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then, if you see me only for mine evil side, it is my wish that this account be destroyed, pulped or whatever synonym you wish to use. If it comes to the point where a man's plea is dismissed as nothing but balderdash, then he has no point in continuing. Farewell. Hoots Hagis Kilts Porridge (talk) 18:52, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

FYI, This user created the arguably vandalistic scots version of the article, with the intention of adding the interwiki here. He actually added the interwiki here once before the scots version even existed: [1], and when he was reverted, he then created the scots version. Equazcion ^(talk) 12:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]