User talk:Honigfrau

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Honigfrau

Thank you for creating Antonino Ferro.

User:Rsjaffe, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

There are additional secondary sources (that are about Ferro but are not by Ferro) that should be added to document the subject's notability. For example, the book "he Post-Bionian Field Theory of Antonino Ferro"

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rsjaffe}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rsjaffe:

Thank you for that. I will make sure to incorporate it into the text.

{Honigfrau (talk) 14:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)}[reply]

Ways to improve Elias Mallet da Rocha Barros

Hello, Honigfrau,

Thank you for creating Elias Mallet da Rocha Barros.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please read WP:BLP and add reliable secondary sources for this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Siroxo}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—siro χ o 08:22, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Masud Khan

Hello, thank you for the note; my changes to Masud Khan are visible here; My reference to overstatement was more aimed at terms like "blatantly" and "tirade", and I disliked the idea that a single researcher long after his death would be stated as "Research by X brought to light numerous sexual abuses" where today's moral standards and terminologies are applied to what may be, on its face, relatively consensual sexual acts with patients but against the standards of all governing bodies of course, the terminology should be arranged more appropriately it seemed to me. But I am not well apprised of the case, hence why I simply reduced it to entering relationships with patients. I promise I have no interest in an edit war :) Virginia Courtsesan (talk) 23:52, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]