User talk:Hongsta

January 2016

Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stan Frazier (musician) have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 02:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gunnar Gehl

The article Gunnar Gehl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC so far. He is mentioned in the LA Times article only in passing. The others are not reliable independent sources. The rest of possible criteria under WP:MUSIC are not even close (has not charted a song, etc.). Maybe after further career growth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 06:47, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The Sam King. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 03:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You get one account only. I blocked the other one, Codezilla07 (talk · contribs), indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 03:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Sam King. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not removed CSDs related to copyrights reddogsix (talk) 03:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Susan Kang for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susan Kang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Kang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 01:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]