User talk:Honey-badger24

October 2014

Hello, I'm Tutelary. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Michael Skolnik— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, bro. I'm pretty sure that edit was spot on. Honey-badger24 (talk) 02:04, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Enjoy the Silence. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 04:23, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, bro. I'm pretty sure that edit was spot on.

Tamale Guy

You know, you can't blank an entire page just because you think its subject is not notable. You can propose it for deletion (See WP:PROD), or take it to WP:AFD, and in some cases, you can nominate it for speedy deletion (See WP:CSD, particularly A7), but you can't just blank the article. Thegreatluigi (talk) 00:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, because it's fucking shit and shouldn't be on wikipedia.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

You started to nominate three articles for deletion, but you didn't finish the nominations: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceres Cafe, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Town Ale House, Chicago, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wieners Circle. Please see WP:AFDHOWTO, step II; you did steps I and III but skipped Step II. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think I sorted it. Would appreciate a check Honey-badger24 (talk) 03:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I made corrections to the three entries (the content had been duplicated in each one), so they're fixed now. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:47, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Honey-badger24 (talk) 00:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 15:14, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

<PA redacted> Honey-badger24 (talk) 23:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your reaction to the "wayward Floridian" nonsense, but please keep your edit summaries to the point and resist the urge to vent. Acroterion (talk) 15:23, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will go further. If you make any more obnoxious comments like that, a block from editing will be the result. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 16:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:29, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's only because of your lack of any previous blocks that this is a timed block. Your response here is obviously unacceptable, in any context,as was the edit summary that led to the above warnings. Tone it down or I'll be more than willing to escalate. Being editorially correct is not a free pass to be rude and disgusting. You need to accept that, right now, or find somewhere else to go. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:32, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Endorse block - your attack on another editor at ANI and here are completely unacceptable.Acroterion (talk) 03:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Honey-badger24! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Far-left politics that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. The edit itself was unreferenced, confused and non-neutral and has been reverted. DanielRigal (talk) 12:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Brandon (talk) 06:16, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Beeblebrox (talk) 02:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]