User talk:HomeoNews

July 2020

Hello, I'm CV9933. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CV9933 (talk) 11:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Talk page is a place to communicate with other editors. It is not a place for essays, or drafts of possible articles. You can use your Sandbox for that. David notMD (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the content in question. Please do not restore it, HomeoNews. Wikipedia is not a free webhost. Bishonen | tålk 19:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi HomeoNews! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Why was the content rejected?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Electrohomeopathy

The greatest of all medical schools are homoeopathic workshops of learning. Materia Medica is taught in most wonderful ways of ElectroHomoeopathy. What a pity that our public has laziness in studies. All old schools of thoughts have proved a failure over ElectroHomoeopathy. HomeoNews (talk) 13:35, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because your account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can go here to search and see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is available to be taken.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Bishonen | tålk 17:48, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]