nice job on doing the article cleanups as they are well needed, although you should leave some time after you tag the articles for people to integrate the material into the article in some other way as opposed to just straight up removing it as that just seems to cause conflict. tagging the articles should be sufficient enough and after time has been given to fix then things can be removed Grande1320:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. You are quite correct, I used a heavy hand that, in retrospect, was not the best approach. I'm trying to revive the Family Guy Wikiproject. It seems rather inactive, its 2 members having last posted any activity on the wiki 4 months and 10 months ago. Any help, advice, pointers, etc... would be most welcome. Thanks again. Homefill21:11, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
maybe you should focus your efforts on other areas of wikipedia that are in more need of help, as doing shows heavy in pop culture such as family guy isnt that productive. If you're able to fix up a lot of other things first and use those as examples for family guy your arguments would be more convincing. Family guy isnt the only section that needs help...there are literally thousands, so you should put forward your efforts to where editing is productive 68.72.141.19021:36, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for encouraging the cleanup of the once-maligned article. However, you may want to watch that article again: I've had to twice revert shady edits of dubious verifiability by a few IP users(such edits that caused me to put a {{totally-disputed}} in the first place). I'm not ruling out alerting administration... Ranma961701:45, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
