User talk:Homagetocatalonia

Welcome!

Hello, Homagetocatalonia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 06:57, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your Adventist Category on the Jaja Wachuku Article

Dear Homagetocatalonia:

Please note that your addition of Adventist Category to the Jaja Wachuku article is wrong. Jaja Wachuku was not a Seventh-day Adventist Christian. He was a Christian of the Anglican Church; and was honoured as a Knight of Saint Christopher [KSC] by the Anglican Communion in Aba, Abia State Nigeria. However, Jaja Wachuku's nephew and author: Ugonna Wachuku is a Seventh-day Adventist in Geneva Switzerland. Please, kindly note that I am respectfully removing your Adventist Category from the Jaja Wachuku article. GOD bless you abundantly!

With love and very good wishes:

(Lord777 10:06, 26 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Parizeau

Hi, you've added Jacques Parizeau as a "Roman Catholic politicians", do you have a source ? -PhDP 06:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Filmon

I see you've added Gary Filmon to the category "Jewish-Canadians". What is your source for this? CJCurrie 15:49, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not certain about this -- it isn't unheard of for B'nai Brith and the JNF to honour non-Jewish members. CJCurrie 02:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion

Hello! I noticed that you have identified yourself as an Anglican, and so I thought that you may be interested in checking out a new WikiProject - WikiProject Anglicanism. Please consider signing up and participating in this collaborative effort to improve and expand articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion! Cheers! Fishhead64 23:44, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board

Hello, I noticed that you identify as a conservative Wikipedian. So I would like to invite you to post any conservative issues you might have over at the new project page, Wikipedia:Conservative_notice_board. Thanks. --Facto 05:31, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq and the War on Terrorism

Wikipedia:WOT has opened its straw poll, and is open to discussion. Rangeley 01:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need help in discussing a list

Greetings; if you would visit the call for discussion at this page, I'd be grateful for your input. Thanks! Talk:List_of_German-language_philosophers Best, Universitytruth 13:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Václav Havel as Category:Roman Catholic politicians

[1]: I'd removed this category. Whether Havel is member of RC church is not widely known and it is also practically irelevant in the Czech Republic. He is not member or supporter of a political party with ties to RC (or any other) church. I believe categories were intended only for the most significant classifications, not for every unverified minor detail. Thanks for understanding. Pavel Vozenilek 16:14, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[Late answer to [2], apology fo the delay]: I do not think any such classification is significant, at least within context of the Czech Republic. I cannot judge know how he is perceived abroad but my anectdotal personal experience would be label "media icon". Pavel Vozenilek 11:30, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Gun_nogun.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gun_nogun.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Attenborough - atheist?

David Attenborough has often declared himself to be an atheist. Has Richard? Do you have any references? -- SteveCrook 22:06, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Campbell

Hi there, I wrote my two cents to your question on Kim Campbell's talk page Dowew 17:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Churches in Windsor

I have proposed this category and all of its contents for deletion; I think this falls under "Wikipedia is not a directory" and also fails notability. I have also proposed some (although not nearly all) of the other Windsor-related articles - the articles on the Hilton and the Radisson, for instance - for similar reasons. If you disagree, feel free to remove my "prod" tags and try to improve the articles or argue that they are fine as they are, on the articles' talk pages. (Although, frankly, I can't see how a Hilton or a generic neighborhood church would merit an encyclopedia article.) Brianyoumans 02:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

Thanks for adding the category to Julianne Moore. We generally prefer citations to be left in the article itself, though that's a little difficult here. Please see this edit where I added the citation as a comment. This particular claim is reliable (see WP:RS) but I have not checked the rest of that site to see if all claims are cited as well as that one is. A claim on that website that is not supported would not be acceptable on the Wikipedia. It is quite likely all are as well supported, however. Once again, thanks! --Yamla 00:42, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Federal election issues article

Hi there. I saw you made some edits to Issues in the Canadian federal election, 2006 a while back. I'm proposing this article be deleted under prod because it's entirely obsolete, and hasn't had any human edits since April. Just wanted to let you know, in case you think it's worth saving. -Joshuapaquin 02:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dianne Haskett

Yes, Dianne Haskett left the Metropolitan United Church in London, Ontario, several years ago (not surprising, given the United Church's evolving liberal stand on same-sex marriage etc.) and now worships at an Evangelical Gosepl Temple. Where precisely, I'm not sure, but I will endeavour to find out and add it to the article on her. Thanks for contacting me. Keep in touch. Barry Wells 22:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:John Jay

Hello, I noticed your edits to Category:John Jay. I created the category and, even after reading the style guides for categories, am not 100% clear on how individual-person categories should themselves be categorized; was your edit based on preference, or on stated policy? (Either way is really fine with me, but I'm curious as to what the policy on the matter is.) Thanks, and best from south of the border. Peace, Paul 17:52, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism COTM

The Anglicanism Collaboration of the Month has been reactivated! Please consider going to the page to either vote for one of the nominated articles, or nominate one yourself. Thanks! Fishhead64 02:39, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:Zairew.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 15:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Coatunionofsouthafrica.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Coatunionofsouthafrica.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:37, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From Slackbuie

Just thought I'd try to answer your question about Apostolic succession in the Church of Scotland here, instead of on the Christian Denominations page. Briefly- in our polity Presbyteries have the role of oversight which in other churches is taken by Bishops. At ordinations, ministers who are members of Presbytery lay hands on the candidate being ordained (a bit of a crowd sometimes!). This is not apostolic succession in the Anglican sense, but it does represent a continuity of faith, so that although we don't often speak about Apostolic Succession in Presbyterian circles, it is possible to maintain that we have a form of Apostolic Succession without bishops. If that doesn't make much sense, please don't lose any sleep over it! Best wishes, Slackbuie 17:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Layton

I'm having a hard time understanding this post: [3]. Did you intend something else? CJCurrie 23:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not opposed to having some sort of flag in the infobox, but why did you choose a Red Ensign? CJCurrie 04:36, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of the Prime Ministers of Canada

Hi there, do you think you could help us out by voting to keep this article? Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children of the Prime Ministers of Canada. Thanks! -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, but they've put Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parents of the Prime Ministers of Canada up on AfD as well. -- Earl Andrew - talk 17:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dianne Haskett's place of worship

Dianne, as you're likely aware, is back in Washington, D.C., and is now the publisher and editor-in-chief of www.BelieveBooks.com, a book publisher that focuses on inspirational stories. Rest assured that the United Church is no longer her place of worship. I, however, don't know where she worships, but she's an evangelical Christian. Barry Wells 00:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Methodism project

It occurred to me that there is not now a functional group dealing with articles related to Methodism. I have thus created a proposal at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Methodism for a group which might deal with such content. If you are interested, please feel free to indicate as much there. Thank you. John Carter 17:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stanley G. Weinbaum

Thank you for experimenting with the page Stanley G. Weinbaum on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Orange Mike 18:00, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused; are you trying to claim Weinbaum was not as notable as people like Asimov said he was? --Orange Mike 18:13, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Heroes of the Christian Church in the Anglican Communion

Please see Category talk:Heroes of the Christian Church in the Anglican Communion. --Flex (talk|contribs) 01:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

alas, no

But hi Eric! --Quadalpha 18:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:) --Quadalpha 18:18, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freemsonry question

You asked about creating a category or list of Freemasons... we already have such a list. See: List of Freemasons.

Feel free to add someone, but be aware of two big criteria for inclusion:

Since this is an encyclopedia, we need some degree of notability.
Additions should be backed by a reliable source.

Good luck Blueboar 15:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We used to have a category, but it was deleted by CfD. This seems to be part of a general movement to cut back on over-categorization... some articles are getting rediculous with the subject listed in hundreds of categories, and categories being created for every interest group and POV. I think there is some discussion of this in the archives at the List. We also talked about it at the Freemasonry project... see: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Freemasonry#Category:Freemasons

A reasonable question. The deletion discussion took place here. Good luck indeed. I would be happy to help resurrect them. Cheers, ☻ Fred|☝ discussion|✍ contributions 17:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In need of your opinion

Hi. Could you please give your opinion concerning this matter: Talk:Mauritius#Possible_conflict_of_interest. (Related to this one: Talk:Rodrigues (island)#Soapbox)

Thanks in advance. Aeons | Talk 07:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goodwin Knight

Per your request for a reference as to this person being a Latter Day Saint, there is documentation here on that. I'm looking for more. It is possible for people to have more than one religious background. For instance Madeleine Albright was born Jewish, raised Roman Catholic and later joined the Episcopal church. --Oakshade 05:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1960s

Thank you for experimenting with the page 1960s on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ----Abebenjoe 18:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

Your map, [[4]] is incorrect. Please can you colour in Senegal (see talk page for more info). 82.163.146.121 09:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Arnold

Arnold classed himself as an Anglican all of his life. His thoughts are often interpretted as agnostic, but only in a rather generic and inconclusive way. I'm going to remove your tag. Please see the discussion on Arnold's religious beliefs on the discussion page for Matthew Arnold. Thanks. Mddietz 19:45, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anglican collaboration of the month

The current Anglicanism collaboration effort is St. Luke's Church (Smithfield, Virginia)

Voting for the next collaboration is going on now. (Vote here)

Wassupwestcoast 00:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Federal monarchy

An editor has nominated Federal monarchy, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal monarchy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St. Joseph's Parish (Toronto)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article St. Joseph's Parish (Toronto), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

- Tinucherian (talk) 10:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kirt Ejesiak

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Kirt Ejesiak, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 17:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Communism and Religion

I'm not an expert on communism, so I've reworded the first sentence per your request. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 21:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Current Members of the Canadian House of Commons

Category:Current Members of the Canadian House of Commons, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Blasphemy1.PNG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Blasphemy1.PNG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 06:37, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removing POV tag in Hindustan Socialist Republican Association

Hi, you had earlier placed a POV tag on Hindustan Socialist Republican Association. I have now done a major rewrite on the article. Can you please check it and see if it is okay to remove the POV tag? Sodabottle (talk) 11:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Philosophical media

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Homagetocatalonia! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 55 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Normand Lester - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Canadian census results on religion

The article Canadian census results on religion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is just a malformed table without an inline citations. This could be a perfectly appropriate article, but it needs to be remade from scratch.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:13, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Categories and religion

Hi, please do make sure that infobox info and categories are fully sourced by inline citations within the article. All cats need refs. Thanks Span (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Wagner (judge)

The article Richard Wagner (judge) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 13:44, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion

Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. D B D 18:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Chuter Ede, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edward Terry Sanford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Episcopalian

James Moore Wayne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Episcopalian

Samuel Nelson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Episcopalian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George M. Humphrey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lev Tahor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CBC and Confinement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Norman Warner, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 04:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dennis Ignatius

The article Dennis Ignatius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Diplomats like this not usually regarded as notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 00:53, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This has now gone to AFD. PatGallacher (talk) 22:07, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert Neelly Bellah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalianism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dalton McGuinty's religion

Hello, the reason I am removing religion from infoboxes of politicians is that their religious beliefs do not bear on their notability as persons. These people have Wikipedia articles because they are/were politicians, not because they attended a particular church. I leave it in place if they are connected to a religion through a secondary profession as is the case of Dennis Drainville or Derwyn Shea.

I am not following any particular policy except that, in my opinion, noting the religion of a politician may bias the articles for some readers. Politics and religion do not mix particularly well and just because it is a line in the infobox does not mean that is has to be filled in. It may be worth noting if the politician have themselves used their religious belief as a motivating factor in their political actions. This is not the same as beliefs on socially prominent topics such as same-sex marriage or abortion which do have a political character. From reading the McGuinty article I don't see how not knowing what church he goes to affects the content of the article. If you think noting his religious belief is worth keeping in the article I'd appreciate hearing your position. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 20:44, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gian Battista Frizzoni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bondo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gian Battista Frizzoni

You should consider visiting https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gian_Battista_Frizzoni and using Google Translate to add content and references to the article you created. Be sure to cite your source(s). Have fun. --Lucas559 (talk) 01:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gideon Welles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Homagetocatalonia. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

v:Calculus I

Please help my translation in:

https://fr.wikiversity.org/wiki/Calcul_infinit%C3%A9simal

My French is only fr-1. I used Google Translate and someone at French Wikipedia said that the translation is not good. Please tell others about the English page, such as high school and college math students and faculty. Thanks in advance.--2602:304:CDC1:90:64C5:4976:D62C:FF33 (talk) 12:18, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Homagetocatalonia. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Homagetocatalonia. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rachel Cusk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]