User talk:Holy worrier
you are responsible for all
[edit]User:MyrddinGaius my edits were reverted and I was blocked because of you. Now I am dutybound to do what I was avoiding. As soon as I can reach a new computer and account.
- Hi, I did not complain against you - so you were not blocked because of me. You can confirm with any admin that I did not complain against you. Let me know if you need help editing the Chitragupta Kayastha or Srivastava page. I have not edited them but we can look at WP:RS. Also, I did not revert your changes after your discussion. It is better not to be malicious as it is usually self-defeating. But you are an intelligent person so follow your judgement. I think the best way is for you to discuss with Admin and explain and request them to unblock you. MyrddinGaius (talk) 17:52, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
User:MyrddinGaius I have found a solution. I dont need a new account. I will just ping some mean lowlife old editor and hand him some stuff. Thanks for the WP:RS idea MG. I will not have to do the dirty painful work, he will. The only alternative is that you add back my edits to all pages. If you decide to do so, you can delete this talk.
- I personally don't have any problem with your edits and that is why I did not revert after we discussed. I downloaded the source you had mentioned and read it carefully as PDF. I think your edits are correct. It has some things written in Indian script that I cannot read but the English translation is there as per your edits. My only concern is they will be reverted by admins as per their rules for British time sources.
- But it is possible they will allow as it is a direct translation of a third party historical letter. I will ask admins for permission by pointing to the quotes in the source. Please feel free to delete this talk and ping me on my talk page. Also, please request admins to unblock your account with sincere explanations. They might agree as you are new. I am not sure what you meant by painful work or what else you want to add. Which other pages did you want your edits to be added? Also, I want to reassure you that I do not have an account on Quora. You are surely mistaking me with someone else. Regards MyrddinGaius (talk) 03:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Doug Weller talk 13:21, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.