User talk:Hollywoodd

August 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cindy Crawford has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cindy Crawford was changed by Hollywoodd (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85363 on 2014-08-15T03:31:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:31, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mark Wahlberg may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

(TV series)|Entourage]]'', ''[[Boardwalk Empire]]'', and ''[[How to Make It in America]]''.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000242/</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see

Hi and wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia! Please see Talk:Gavin de Becker#User:Hollywoodd and reply there (not here). Thanks! —Unforgettableid (talk) 05:14, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:INOROUT / MOS:LQ

I suggest to review MOS:INOROUT, also known as MOS:LQ and MOS:LOGICAL, which explains the punctuation styling for quotations on Wikipedia. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Hipal (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]