User talk:Hollow Ween
April 2024
[edit]
Please do not delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors, as you did at Talk:Paola Cortellesi. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Οἶδα (talk) 02:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- They are not legitimate, you and another user whose IP that was already reported multiple times for vandalism are trying to pass a legitimate edit for non-neutral for you only know the reason, but the quotation marks on words and the sources are not there for decoration. Also, using political buzzwords and insinuations in the talk page does not help. Hollow Ween (talk) 11:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Me and another user whose IP that was already reported multiple times for vandalism? I have no clue what you are talking about. And your account is new. So which IP are you? Also, political buzzwords? You're only confirming this is just staid culture war drama that has no enyclopedic relevance to the subject. Οἶδα (talk) 18:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Paola Cortellesi, you may be blocked from editing. Οἶδα (talk) 18:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Οἶδα (talk) 19:03, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Content disputes should be discussed on article talk pages, not in edit summaries and not by edit-warring. Schazjmd (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Paola Cortellesi. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Οἶδα (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.