User talk:Hoglin2020

July 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Outpost—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:22, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:KlFJcskljh ffdhs bkfbjaf hlkhfhffhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhdfa Hoglin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:KlFJcskljh ffdhs bkfbjaf hlkhfhffhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhdfa Hoglin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S0091 (talk) 21:35, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. S0091 (talk) 21:36, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:FgsjahJKL

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:FgsjahJKL, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S0091 (talk) 21:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits

Your overwriting of Outpost with Minecraft info is disruptive, as is your creation of nonsense draft articles. Please stop, lest your account be blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you restore it again, you will be blocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:42, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:58, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be unblocked.

Please unblock Hoglin2020. I, Hoglin2020 won't vandalize wikipedia.

Another reason for an indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Via "Ramtrucks20". -- Hoary (talk) 04:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]