User talk:Hoenir1

Welcome

Hello, Hoenir1, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Hoenir1, good luck, and have fun. Stinglehammer (talk) 14:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Sami assembly of 1917) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Sami assembly of 1917, Hoenir1!

Wikipedia editor Hydronium Hydroxide just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your work. I've linked this from a few pages to deorphan it.

To reply, leave a comment on Hydronium Hydroxide's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 10:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hi Hoenir1, the new article looks fantastic and I see a Wikipedia community member has reviewed it and added some links from other English Wikipedia articles so that others can discover it. So the only possible issue that I can see with the article is where the citations have gone slightly wrong in the references section. Using the reference details from the original source article and inputting the problem ones again may help resolve this quite simply. Would you be okay to have a go at that? The Visual Editor should allow you to input the url address, author and title (etc.) quite simply but let me know if you need a hand with this - Adding citations using the Visual Editor. Stinglehammer (talk) 13:18, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]