User talk:Hochungra

About Me

Hello Wikipedians! I am a long time professional journalist. I co-wrote a 12-vol. encyclopedia on North American Indians, and I cover these issues as well as science, environment, health and technology. My interest here is to increase the visibility of Native American journalism, and science, health, and environmental journalism in general. My well researched entries and edits seek to meet scientific scholarship but in language readers can understand, as well as reduce omitted, misleading or poorly cited material -- a disservice to students, reporters and researchers needing facts and transparency. I clean up glaring errors, add citations and references, stamp out bias, and in general try to perform a useful service. I am making every effort to follow Wikipedia manners, but I keep learning. Please bear with me, I am here to help. I am part of the WP:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas.

I am dismayed to see in Wikipedia editors who project bias, propagandize, or intentionally use hot button words in areas like policy issues, human diversity, mental health and elsewhere. Professional journalists research and report objectively and without bias a full and fair accounting so readers are free to make their own judgements. We owe them the same on Wikipedia. Anything else is propaganda. I research the facts when I see cases of this.

I am easy to approach if you have questions about my edits. I ask for common courtesies. As an early Wikipedian I met with unpleasant exchanges over new entries related to Native American journalism. After attempts to resolve these failed it became worthy of a news story, which drew letters from mainstream journalism organizations, i.e. the Society of Environmental Journalists to Wikimedia's Foundation. I was told by Wikimedia head of communications Jay Walsh that Wikipedians are passionate about policies, but there are a few cases in which bias is suspect. Our news organization wassc assured Foundation members would investigate, and reinstate the twice-deleted Native American Journalists Association. Some of the unfortunate comments that follow relate to these early attempts to raise the visibility of Native American journalism.

Alleged Copyright Violation Native American Journalists Association

I received an okay from the Native American Journalists Association to use their content in recreating their site after a deletion for lack of notability by nawlinwiki. Due to alleged copyright violation, I requested and received a confirmation from the Native American Journalists Association executive director, that I had permission to use their content. His letter: December 22, 2010

TO: Hochungra FROM: Jeffery Harjo, Executive Director, Native American Journalists Association RE: Update to Wikipedia entry

Wikipedia editors,

Hochungra has the permission of the Native American Journalists Association to post information about our organization as it appears on our website.

I am the Executive Director for the Native American Journalists Association and the Wikipedia entry is very important to keep future and current journalists informed about our organization.

Thank you,

Jeffery D. Harjo Executive Director Native American Journalists Association harjo@naja.com

Request Assistance Rob Capriccioso marked for deletion

My aim here is to provide better coverage of Native Americans, including Native American journalism. It took hours of research to re-write Native American Journalists Association, which had been marked for deletion, and deleted. I am in the process of adding notable Native American journalists (See Category:Native American journalists; also Category:Native American writers). The page I created for one of Indian Country's most noted Native American journalists, Rob Capriccioso is now marked for deletion. I have requested expertise and editing assistance from the WikiProject Indigenous Peoples of North America. I am seeing that Native American journalism is being marginalized on Wikipedia, while other minority journalism groups do not suffer the same. Any assistance in these efforts is appreciated, as are all constructive comments. --Hochungra (talk) 18:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Signed: User:Hochungra --Hochungra (talk) 18:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)== Welcome == Hello, Hochungra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.[reply]

I notice that one of the first articles you have edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then get me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that if more than one person is using this account to edit, then unfortunately it will be blocked from editing.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! tedder (talk) 03:57, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User Talk

Thank you for your warm welcome and words of advice. I will read those entries you suggest that I have not yet read. I do not believe there is a conflict of interest; I am writing about a subject I am very familiar with, news gathering, reporting and editing. Notable Native American reporters should be added to Wikipedia, as well as a new sub-category:Native American journalists under the existing category:Journalists by nationality. Note too, Wikipedia has a category for Native American writers. There are also some fine Native American journalists of note deserving of a listing. Their listings will be useful to students and the general public. In the very near future I plan to add a two more biographical entries. I'll watch the first, to see what the requirements are as it evolves. I added references, and support for notability. <hochungraHochungra (talk) 04:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)>/hochungra>[reply]

Hi, I created Category:Native American journalists and it's ready to be populated (I added the cat to a couple articles). You don't have to request a category to be created, you can just create them yourself as needed – in the same manner that you would create an article. Happy wiki-ing! Cheers, -Uyvsdi (talk) 17:48, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As per request on my talk page

You happen to pm the right guy i think, as i have lots of links to books on just the things you seem to need- although not to specific. I cant help with any editing as i just have the links... I will list them bellow - with all the info you need to use them as refs ...you will have to add page numbers...(ps i have more links )....Moxy (talk) 21:48, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Native American journalists

- Native American issues By Paul C. Rosier - Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 2003 - isbn ISBN: 0313320020
- The American journalist in the 21st century: U.S. news people at the dawn of ...- By David Hugh Weaver - Routledge - isbn 0805853820
- Journalism across cultures - By Fritz Cropp, Cynthia M. Frisby, Dean Mills - Ames : Iowa State Press, 2003 - isbn 0813819997
- American journalists: getting the story - By Donald A. Ritchie - New York : Oxford University Press, 1997 - isbn 0195099079
- Radio cultures: the sound medium in American life - By Michael C. Keith - New York, NY Lang, Peter New York 2008 - isbn 9780820486482

Native American writers

- Great American Writers: Twentieth Century - By R. Baird Shuman - New York : Marshall Cavendish, 2002 - isbn 0761472401
- Native American perspectives on literature and history - By Alan R. Velie - Norman : University of Oklahoma Press, 1995 -isbn 0806127856
- Native American Writers - By Harold Bloom - New York : Bloom's Literary Criticism, ©2010- isbn 9781604135916
- Native American Writers - By Steven Otfinoski - New York : Chelsea House, 2010 - isbn 9781604133141
- That the people might live: Native American literatures and Native American ...- By Jace Weaver - New York : Oxford University Press, 1997 - isbn 0195118529
- Native Americans Today: A Biographical Dictionary - By Bruce E. Johansen - Santa Barbara, Calif. : Greenwood Press, 2010 - isbn 9780313355547
- Native American women's writing c. 1800-1924: an anthology - By Karen L. Kilcup - Oxford : Blackwell Publishers, 2000 - isbn 0631205179

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hochungra for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Using others to sway consensus, and conflict of interest

Hello. I understand your arguments regarding the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Capriccioso (2nd nomination), though I disagree with them. As someone else noted on that page, it's against Wikipedia guidelines to use other editors as proxies to sway discussions like this, which is called Meatpuppetry. Something similar, Wikipedia:Canvassing, which is notifying other editors to influence the decision in one way is also frowned upon. It's also important to note that those sorts of discussions aren't a vote, the majority doesn't always win, which is why in this case it was closed as no consensus. Not saying you are doing any of that, but if you are, please don't.

Also, I don't appreciate your and User:torrenceg's comments that I am somehow biased against Rob Capriccioso because I live in DC (and that you did some research to find out that I'm also a blogger). I've never met him and I don't think I've ever read anything by him. I found the page via Category:Writers from Washington, D.C. Please Wikipedia:Assume good faith. --AW (talk) 21:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Allegations of Sock Puppetry, Meat Puppetry, Canvassing, or other

I created the Rob Capriccioso page, then followed it and responded to the nomination for deletion. I didn't join in with anyone. Another allegation without merit was that I was used my account for more than one name to make arguments against deletion. Fortunately an editor checked IP addresses and debunked that. Re AWiseman's criticism he didn't appreciate my investigating any bias on his part, that is what I am trained as a journalist to do. It took little research to learn AW was also a DC writer. If investigating possible bias is a violation of Wikipedia then we need to raise a discussion of transparency. This was one of my early contributions; it and another involving Native American journalism were nominated for deletion as not notable. I stepped out of further edits or arguments for the Capriccioso entry after these untrue allegations of terms I wasn't even familiar with. Note this entry has stood without my further participation. The second deletion of the Native American Journalists Association that I also challenged was rewritten and reinstated by members of the Wikimedia Foundation, and marked Do Not Delete. I hope this clears my good name. I see editing Wikipedia as a way to contribute to the public good in spite of an erratic schedule that doesn't lend to volunteer projects.

Speedy deletion nomination of Rob Capriccioso

A tag has been placed on Rob Capriccioso, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Thousand Bullets (talk) 03:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Native American Journalists Association

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Native American Journalists Association, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.naja.com/index.php/about/naja-history/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Native American Journalists Association and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Native American Journalists Association, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Native American Journalists Association with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Native American Journalists Association. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Native American Journalists Association saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — CactusWriter ^(talk) 06:29, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hochungra. You have new messages at Talk:Native American Journalists Association.
Message added — CactusWriter ^(talk) 21:10, 23 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Update regarding copyright concern

Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above and sufficient time has passed since the placement of the notice, the article Native American Journalists Association has been deleted for copyright concerns. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (if you are not the copyright holder or have co-authored the material, release under CC-BY-SA-compatible license alone is sufficient), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may (or resend it, if you believe your original may have been lost), and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that our licenses permit modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained and future copies are compatibly licensed.

Please note that once permission is verified, the material may be evaluated and altered to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Although we appreciate donations, we cannot guarantee that material donated will be retained.

Thank you. Andy Walsh (talk) 00:31, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Journalism Network.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 21:43, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Journalism Network.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hair^Talk 18:47, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Journalism Network concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Journalism Network, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Journalism Network

Hello Hochungra. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Earth Journalism Network".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Earth Journalism Network}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Terri Crawford Hansen page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Country Today, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winnebago (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rob Capriccioso for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rob Capriccioso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Capriccioso (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 21:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]