User talk:Hobbles4u

July 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Chicago-style pizza, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ZimZalaBim ^talk 21:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

https://www.dnainfo.com/chicago/20150113/chicago/guide-chicago-pizza-from-deep-dish-tavern-style-beyond/ and https://www.detroitnews.com/story/life/food/2014/09/19/chicago-pizza-tour-slice-pie-deepdish/15907921/ both already cited. https://www.bonappetit.com/story/real-chicago-pizza-tavern-style, https://blog.slicelife.com/chicago-pizza-deep-dish-tavern-style/, https://chicago.eater.com/maps/best-chicago-thin-crust-pizza-restaurants-tavern-style, https://explore.visitoakpark.com/info/true-chicago-pizza/ ,are new sources I can add. I don't consider deep dish to be the Chicago-style but fine with both being considered, how I initially changed the page to. Even more to the matter both the original citations don't establish deep dish as Chicago-style. The bottom line is it's false information to not have both front and center as it stands and is misinforming anyone from other parts of the world. Anyone from out of the state thinks all we eat is deep dish but its the other way around, they don't even know we have thin crust because of false info like the top part of this wiki here. Hobbles4u (talk) 22:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)