User talk:Hoanghao314159

February 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to List of largest known stars, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 13:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mlkj. I noticed that in this edit to List of largest known stars, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mlkj (talk) 12:44, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm InTheAstronomy32. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Spica, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 18:45, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer. I noticed that you added information to List of largest known stars without reason and without reliable sources. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. If you want to re-add it, please cite sources and give a valid argument for your edit(s). If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 13:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at VY Canis Majoris, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 13:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 (1)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of largest known stars, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not remove likely very accurate information as well, such as the limit for star size, stars much larger than that would be very unstable (this is also consistent with models of stellar atmospheres).SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 15:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic User:Hoanghao314159. Thank you. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 15:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 (2)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 18:33, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoanghao314159 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

useful content only from now

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:37, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoanghao314159 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

if i add information i will add the reliable source into that

Decline reason:

Please follow Deepfriedokra's advice, above. Yamla (talk) 12:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UY Scuti's radius

Please do not re-add UY Sct's 1,708 R_☉. It has been removed from its page and the list of largest known stars per WP consensus. If you want it back, please give a valid reason and discuss it on its talk page. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 19:31, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Achernar have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 12:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Stellar classification. DVdm (talk) 14:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK OK I will just read and edit constructively and validly, please? Hoanghao314159 (talk) 12:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of largest known stars

Please do not add Stephenson 2 DFK 1 and/or UY Scuti. They both have very inaccurate estimations of their properties (St2-18 has an extremely uncertain distance of over 50% and an unreasonably low effective temperature (200-300 K below the Hayashi line) which would make the star very unstable and UY Sct has a distance that has effectively been guessed based on its luminosity class) and have been removed per WP consensus. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 14:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Next time you change values (like you did on list of largest stars), find the original source and change the citation to that. Otherwise this can easily be perceived as disruptive editing and your edit will be reverted. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer 21:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]