User talk:Hjahangiry

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions.

February 2017

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to New York City, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:28, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Salmas. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I live here and my sources are all accurate even if I haven't got the time to add them yet or even IF I AM the source! You stop reverting my edits just because you have power but no knowledge, it doesn't give you this right to interfere with people's righteous edits! If I don't do this, though in a slow pace, my city will have just a couple of awful pictures on the net to be introduced by just some ... like you felt like they are wrong and he should block me!

Welcome!

Hello, Hjahangiry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above links may help you. Please note that unsourced content will get deleted. This is nothing personal, it's just Wikipedia policy. And calling other editors childish names will also not be much help. If you want to improve the article, do some research, add some reliable sources, and before long the article will have improved. I hope this helps. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I got the point and appreciate that. The fact is that there aren't much sources in English (nor in Persian) on my city and I have to work hard on that while it consumes some good portion of my time. However, I will do my best to do as told; thank you.

PS. the previous name in the message will be removed.

May 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Salmas, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The sources cited did not support your edit. I was unable to find the date you cited on the English link. For the non-English link, using Google translate, the data you cited could not be found. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Date" should have been "data". My error. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

1. A country's Census center is reliable! Both links are valid and you just know nothing! Both links are valid! 2. Did you think about changing the 'Solar Calendar' date to the dates in 'Gregorian Calendar'? I thought so! Oh, and here is the English headline with the 'Gregorian Calendar' citation for the blind eyes, you ...! "Selected Results of the 2016 National Population and Housing Census" (Check it before reverting!) 3. This is hypocrisy cause I did add and edit Salmas County with the same source and nobody changed it; it's just YOU! 4. Please stop falsely reverting my edits cause someday I might sue your ...! 5. Google Translation?! Really?! Illiteracy of Some + Google Translation = Disaster on Wikipedia!

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hjahangiry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Prolog (talk) 05:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hjahangiry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your systematic technological issues of being targeted hence causing the vandalism

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:12, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.