User talk:Hiyicam

Welcome!

Hello, Hiyicam, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Chandan Madan (Indian actor), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! // Timothy :: talk 05:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chandan Madan (Indian actor)

The article Chandan Madan (Indian actor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP, fails GNG and BIO. SIngle source in article is IMDB. BEFORE showed nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth, promo, database listings, etc. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. // Timothy :: talk 05:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chandan Madan (actor) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chandan Madan (actor). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok sir thanks sure I improve this article and after publish thanks for help. 🙏 Hiyicam (talk) 05:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandan Madan (actor) (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NACTOR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chandan Madan (actor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hiyicam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chandan Madan (Indian actor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chandan Madan (Indian actor), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 13:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't recreate articles when they have been moved to draft. Work on improving the original draft to where it gets accepted instead. Ravensfire (talk) 13:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chandan Madan (actor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chandan Madan (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandan Madan (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ravensfire (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove this article of mine is my dream project Please don't remove I promise I will try to bring the article to a relablable source

Thanks. Hiyicam (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And yet an article was made on the Chandan Maidan actor before this, why did the Wikipedia administrator convert him to a cricketer? Hiyicam (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you moved the article out of draft space, despite my plea NOT to do so and work on getting it through the process, the only option for such a sub-par article is to nominate it for deletion. Do they meet WP:NACTOR? From what's sourced in the article, no they don't. That's where you should have started. Multiple significant roles in notable shows. Articles in quality sources that have significant coverage of Madan.

The article at Chandan_Madan was originally on the actor but it was changed to a redirect because the actor wasn't notable. See [1]. The next edit a month+ later was to create it based on the cricket player that does meet the WP:NCRICKET. Again, it's all about notability. You say the actor is notable, but the article doesn't support that. Wikipedia articles are about what's supported by sources, not what you want to be in there. Ravensfire (talk) 15:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]