User talk:HiveEmperor

Welcome!

Hi HiveEmperor! I noticed your contributions to Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Red Panda 25 22:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will check this out if needed. HiveEmperor (talk) 18:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken, you may be blocked from editing. Mike Allen 23:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you’re confused. I’m not adding things I made up, I’m adding things relevant to the article that I have found during research of the film. Perhaps it comes across as “violating policies” but I assure you, several people would disagree.

Thanks for your feedback but I can guarantee you I’m helping the article. HiveEmperor (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Take the Potential Sequel section I had to re add several times. There are articles that prove what I am saying is true. Even other editors have seen it and have pointed it out. I’m new to this whole thing so please, do not assume I am trying to disrupt anything. HiveEmperor (talk) 20:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay buddy, I don’t know who you are but I’d like to make it clear that I am not trolling. I’m simply contributing to the page and would appreciate it if you didn’t accuse me of such things and just let me contribute. From my perspective it appears you are doing the trolling, but I believe this to be a simple miscommunication. I apologise if it comes across as trolling but I have said it time and time again, it is not. I hope you understand. HiveEmperor (talk) 18:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

And you are still doing this. I don't know what this was supposed to be, but it's not working, and this edit summary is ridiculous. Drmies (talk) 12:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, there were citations and everything. Someone removed the whole section and I didn’t know how to properly rescue the citations until someone else did. Blame the first guy who removed it yesterday who said “this film has no chance of a sequel”. HiveEmperor (talk) 22:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken. Drmies (talk) 12:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it would in fact be sourced if people weren’t being stupid and constantly removing the sources. Quit with the false accusations. HiveEmperor (talk) 18:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Attempting to resume edit-warring after final warning

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The next block will be longer. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Problem

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HiveEmperor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not “edit warring” or whatever I’ve been wrongly accused of, I’m trying to add something to the page that was wrongfully removed despite being sourced and relevant to the page. I would like to be given permission to re add the content and be unblocked as I did not do anything wrong and have been wrongly penalised for it.HiveEmperor (talk) 18:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Indicating that you plan to continue edit warring if unblocked indicates we should extend your block indefinitely. Is that really what you want? I very, very strongly suggest taking completely the opposite approach. Actually read and understand WP:EW and then explain why your edits were inappropriate. Yamla (talk) 18:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block

So now I am being accused of trying to “edit war” and am being threatened with a permanent ban even though I have done absolutely nothing wrong except try to add a part of a page that was removed despite being sourced and RELEVANT. Absolutely ridiculous. Surely this breaks rules. HiveEmperor (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It had citations and everything and some person removed it due to their own personal bias (they stated that “this movie has zero chance of a sequel”, which indicates bias) thus starting an edit war. I was trying to help undo the vandalism and because of that one person, chaos ensued and now I’m forced to take the blame. I want to resolve this. HiveEmperor (talk) 19:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IDHT. --Yamla (talk) 20:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not “refusing to get the point”. I’m trying to say that it was added by myself and other people too with citations and everything and it was removed on the basis of “being unsourced” or “irrelevant”. It wasn’t even me who added the section in the first place, plus I didn’t start the edit war so quit accusing me already. HiveEmperor (talk) 21:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not even saying “add it back”, I’m just saying “It didn’t need to be removed” HiveEmperor (talk) 21:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]