User talk:Historynerd2

Welcome!

Hello, Historynerd2, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! SchreiberBike | ⌨ 01:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Please use edit summaries to explain the changes you make. That's one of the easiest ways for editors to communicate with one another. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 01:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Scheer (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references here don't give enough coverage to satisfy the general notability guideline. If possible, please link to the newspaper articles to make it easier for reviewers to assess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward Scheer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Historynerd2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering about the range map shown at the Podophyllum peltatum page which appears to be your contribution. It seems to extend much farther south in Florida than what is shown in other sources. In particular, The USDA plant database shows it existing in only Jackson county while the citizen science website, iNaturalist, shows a southernmost sighting in Tallahasee. I'm curious as to where your shared information comes from?

Thanks in advance, Cosmicaug (talk) 03:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for messaging me! To make these range maps I typically use BONAP and the USDA for the U.S. However Florida is definitely wrong, as well as Texas. I will remove this from the page soon, but I am not sure why I added those areas to the map. I will make an updated version as soon as I have available time.

Thank you again, Historynerd2 (talk) 01:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]