User talk:HistoryRasel

January 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 19:39, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HistoryRasel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not cause any abuse. I just pointed out that a quote from Surah al-ikhlas in ' God in Islam ' page existed before i edited. I suggested for restoration of that quote. Thanks HistoryRasel (talk) 06:04, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppet of Asadul rasel (talk · contribs). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:28, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One account per person please. Use your original account, Asadul rasel. And you clearly don't understand the reason that quotation was removed, after it has been explained to you multiple times, in edit comments and in reply to you on my talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:14, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]