User talk:Historian info

Welcome!

Hello, Historian info, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 19:56, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi. I see you have added a lot of information to Punjab (India). The information may be good information but you have to give a way for other users to check the information. If not it can be more easily removed since it doesn't have a scholarly source backing it up. Would you please add the source you used to get that information? Wikipedia:Citing sources and Wikipedia:Footnotes may both help you if you are having syntax problems. Thanks. gren グレン 02:26, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My main goal was to introduce you as a new user to citing sources. If you don't cite your work from neutral sources another editor can say "that doesn't seem right" and remove it... if you have cited the source where it comes from then it is more likely that it will stay in the article for the long term. Also, the information had to come from somewhere and it's not all common knowledge--citing sources avoids plagiarism. gren グレン 13:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rajput and Gujjar arent castes. They are ethnicities who Jats have much more in common with than Pashtuns. They are thought to have a shared ancestry, do your research. And by the way, Punjabi and Sindhi are two very broad terms. Punjabi can consist of many different ethnic groups.

reported Atulsnischal for vandalism

fyi... User:Atulsnischal has been reported for Vandalism here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Syed Atif Nazir (talk • contribs) 14:03, August 26, 2007 (UTC)

Efforts to hijack Singh article

Editors of this "Singh" and the "Rajput" article are requested to work on the article Singh, as some people are making constant effort to hijack the article and keep it only for Sikhs saying that provide reference if Singh is a Rajput common name, they keep erasing reference that Sing is a Rajput name at all. They keep proving that Singh is a Sikh name only. I suspect these are foreign editors who have no idea what they are talking about obviously.

See this version of the article that erases all reference that Singh is a common name used by Rajputs: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Singh&oldid=153438525

Kindly provide a lot of references and facts that Singh is a Rajput name and also provide how many Rajputs may be using it as a middle or as the last name because I know Rajputs who migrated outside Rajasthan to other states many hundred years ago have lost touch and now use it now as their last name.

Kindly help to work on Singh article when you all get some time, Thanks

Atulsnischal 17:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Su-35BM

Thanks for the support. I'm working on the article at the moment; I should have it posted in about half an hour. Zaku^Talk 20:21, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sukhoi Su-35BM Zaku^Talk 20:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course; it is named "Su-35BM". Zaku^Talk 20:54, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think so; the Su-35BM was the only Su-35 at MAKS-2007. Zaku^Talk 21:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi Historian info,

You seem to have a lot knowledge & expertise about Jat people. Please help me clean up and improve the article because you have done a wonderful job on it with your additions before. Regards --Sikh historian (talk) 07:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jat people

Ok. I will put that page on my watchlist, no problem. Yeah, it can be quite tense when reverting vandalism. Especally when you are in a vandal war such as this. But I make sure that the vandal gets blocked for it. Should I request that the Jat people article be semi protected? King Lopez ^Contribs 10:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hi

please check Deh Siva Var Mohe. lots of disruptive edits. Help maintain. an anonymous ip is stating Siva with Shiva, despite ref. and disscuss.Ajjay (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jat people

Sure, I understand what you are saying although Britannica does deserve a mention somewhere as it is considered the exemplary source. Cheers Trips (talk) 15:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hinduism

Please check the talk pages on Hinduism, The article has been locked and it seems only missionary people are allowed to edit it now. I believe the whole article nhas been hijacked. Please send me a mail and look into the talk pages. Sindhian (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Russian Aircraft variants

Just in case no one has answered your question about why Russia produces more variants of it's domestically produced aircraft when compared to the West (Su-35 article), the short answer is that the Russian manufacturers have a policy of tailoring their aircraft to their customers' needs. Compared to military purchases from Western sources, many purchasers of Russian equipment prefer to install components from Italian, French, British, Israeli and other Defense contractors for their particular needs including adaptability to existing weapons stores, compatibility and integration with existing aircraft in service, superior components from said contractors, cost, etc.

This also happens with Western military purchases too, but this is more commonly involves minor, less technical components, although I'm sure there are several examples to the contrary.

(Bobbo9000 (talk) 14:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Jat people organisations

I have nominated Category:Jat people organisations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 18:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jats

hi sir,

nice main pic of Jat people by you,,,but I was wondering if you can add these images with main image--

1)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bhupendra_Singh_Patiala.jpg

2)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Maharaja_Bhim_Singh_Rana.jpg

3)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:14th_Murrays_Jat_Lancers_(Risaldar_Major)_by_AC_Lovett_(1862-1919).jpg

images 1,2 are of imp. jat rulers and image 3 is of soldier of jat regiment.

thanks

-- Last Emperor (talk) 06:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Ethnic Group-Jat People.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Ethnic Group-Jat People.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]