User talk:Ejazz128

Welcome!

Hi Histolix! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 18:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or website, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf^(talk) 20:34, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ejazz128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Ejazz128 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand the reason for my block, and I am requesting an unblock with a new username. I intend to make constructive, neutral edits to Wikipedia without promoting any organization or website.

Decline reason:

Please tell how you will do that consistent with the conflict of interest policy, and tell what specific topics you intend to edit about. 331dot (talk) 10:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot hii sir i understand Wikipedia’s Conflict of Interest policy and the importance of keeping edits neutral and non-promotional. I plan to contribute to factual topics such as Computing, technology, Web-devlopment, Coding and I will avoid topics related to my personal website. I am committed to following Wikipedia's guidelines for neutrality and non-promotion moving forward. Histolix (talk) 11:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a new request so another admin can review it. You may just refer to your above comment, you don't need to duplicate it. 331dot (talk) 13:46, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ejazz128 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request another review of my unblock request. I have provided details above, explaining that I understand the Conflict of Interest policy and intend to make neutral contributions to factual topics like web development and HTML encoding.

Accept reason:

Unblock request accepted. Please be extremely careful to avoid promotional editing, and don't forget to disclose your COI on your userpage. Cheers! -- asilvering (talk) 15:33, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the only thing you did wrong is to add your website to the external links of the article you're working on. That article isn't overly promotional, so I'm not really worried here and it looks to me like it will be fien to unblock you. But can you please confirm for us that you know what you ought to do if you're writing something on a topic that is a conflict of interest for you? What would you do if you wanted to create a new article on such a topic? What would you do if you wanted to edit an article that already exists in the encyclopedia on such a topic? -- asilvering (talk) 19:59, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering Thank you sir for the guidance. I understand Wikipedia’s Conflict of Interest policy and the importance of avoiding edits that could seem promotional. If I wanted to work on a topic related to my own projects, I would avoid directly creating or editing such articles. Instead, I would use the talk page to suggest edits so that neutral editors can review them. I am committed to following this approach in the future. Histolix (talk) 03:09, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you. @Alexf, what do you think? -- asilvering (talk) 03:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering ThankYou Very Much sir Ejazz128 (talk) 10:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering: Ok, no issues then. -- Alexf^(talk) 14:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexf

Hello @Alexf, thank you for confirming there are no issues. I just wanted to follow up to see if my account could now be unblocked. Please let me know if there’s anything further I need to do. Thanks again for your help Ejazz128 (talk) 14:31, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're set, but please do disclose the COI on your userpage and add a COI notice to the talk page of the draft you've been working on. -- asilvering (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering

Thank you sir. I will add the COI disclosure to my user page and the talk page of the draft as requested. Ejazz128 (talk) 15:46, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]