User talk:Hisokratch

December 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of political and geographic borders, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 16:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you next time I'll provide a valid reason . Hisokratch (talk) 16:19, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of political and geographic borders, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 16:22, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I provided the reason as you said if you disagree with would you please state why . Hisokratch (talk) 16:25, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Western Sahara" is not a political entity it's a part of a country and some beleive that's a disputed territory . please refer to the article about it in Wikipedia . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara Hisokratch (talk) 16:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Providing some "explanation" doesn't make it a valid reason to remove the content. Whether some people like it or not, Western Sahara exists and so do its international borders. That's a fact. M.Bitton (talk) 16:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton It's not a fact western sahara is not a political entity . Hisokratch (talk) 16:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And you are not providing any argument or valid source . Hisokratch (talk) 16:35, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And by reverting my edit and threatening to prevent me from editing is just what dictators do . Hisokratch (talk) 16:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome to waste start a discussion about it on the article's talk page (a waste of time if you ask me), but calling me a dictator and edit warring won't be tolerated. M.Bitton (talk) 16:41, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton I just checked your page and I won't waste my time with you because you're clearly defending a certain agenda Hisokratch (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does that make you? M.Bitton (talk) 16:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton If it was written "Polisario" or "The sahrawi republic" .We wouldn't be having this kind of discussion but "Western Sahara " is a geographical name not a political one . Hisokratch (talk) 16:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The SADR is also known as "Western Sahara" (illegal expression in a country that claims and occupies some of it), therefore, you don't have a point (regardless of how you approach it). M.Bitton (talk) 16:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton I made my point that name isn't political .And few people supported by a foreign government don't have the right to speak for dozens of moroccans.And establishing a government with no land or being legitimate. Hisokratch (talk) 16:53, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There it is! No comment necessary. M.Bitton (talk) 16:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton Nothing is there . Hisokratch (talk) 16:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of political and geographic borders. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at List of political and geographic borders. M.Bitton (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (List of political and geographic borders) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]