User talk:HiroProtagonist30

August 2015

Stop already. The Convert template is accurate. Don't revert Omura's whale again. Thanks. Dger (talk) 22:13, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Accurate my ass. You're a cunt. Go home.~~ HiroProtagonist30 (talk) 01:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is about time you read this, WP:5P4, the fourth pillar of Wikipedia. Name calling is the fastest way to lose an argument. Dger (talk) 03:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What name calling? I was just telling you you're a cunt. As in you let people put their dicks in you and you just take it. Like a cunt. See. Not knowing anything about a subject whatsoever is the fastest way to lose an argument my dear. That's something only little bitches do. HiroProtagonist30 (talk) 19:52, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sei whale shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:01, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 04:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]