User talk:Hirabutor

Welcome!

Hello, Hirabutor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Aruğ (Arı), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mr X 00:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aruğ (Arı)

The article Aruğ (Arı) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-English dictionary definition. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Mr X 00:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aruğ (Arı) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aruğ (Arı) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aruğ (Arı) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Mr X 22:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Dear Hirabutor, thank you for the good words. Barefact (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Yurmat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Turkic, Mongolian, Bashkir, Bolgar, Evenki, Yakut, Ugric and Chuvash

Bashkirs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mongolian, Bulgar, Ugric, Chuvash, Katai, Tarján and Megyer

Hungarians (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Megyer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Subartu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Greek, Slavic, Mongolian and Buryat

Jasz people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Khwarezmian

Jazig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kipchak

Sabir people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sibir

Sir (people) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Turkic

White Croats (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Oghur

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TheMesquito^buzz 22:53, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hoşgeldin!

Iyi günler Yagmurlukorfez, gördüğüm gibi birkaç haftadır viki'de meşgulsun. Umarım fars şovenistlerden veya türk karşıtı olan batılı şahıslardan hiç de şaşırmamışsındır. Maalesef başta fars şovenistleri olmak üzere çok yaygındır buralarda. Bende ayni şeyi yaşadım, ama çok şükür ki şimdiye kadar başarılarına ulaşamadılar. Nedenlerinden biri güvenilir ve sağlam kaynaklar kullanmamdır. Seninle konuşmak istediğim esas konu aslında fars şovenistlerin bir sürü kukla hesapları kullanmasıdır. Şu ana kadar bazılarını deşifre ettim. Fakat bu konuyu seninle artik gizli bir şekilde muamele etmek istiyorum. Herhangi bir hususi iletişim imkanin varsa çok sevinirim. Saygılarımla. --Hirabutor (talk) 11:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

İlginiz için teşekkürler. Evet, burada açıkca milliyetçilik yapan, uydurma nedenlerle kaynaklı içerik kaldıran (özellikle belli başlı konularda) kullanıcılara rastladım. Kırgızlar ile ilgili en son yaşanan bana yönelik ırkçı saldırıdan ve yapılan vandalizmden haberiniz vardır büyük olasılıkla. Dediğiniz gibi bir "şovenist gruplaşma" var mı, varsa da bu tam olarak ne yönde emin değilim ama son yaşananlara bakarsak bu oldukça olası görünüyor. Türkçe vikipedide IRC üzerinden görüşebiliriz. Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Şu aralar biraz meşgulum, ancak haftaya devam edebiliriz. Türkçe vikipedide görüşmek üzere. --Hirabutor (talk) 11:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Non-English racist and anti-ethnicity comments. Thank you. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 03:35, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Giazi

Hello Hirabutor,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Giazi for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Amortias (T)(C) 17:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for reminding. Can we merge the text to the article Pecheneg? --Hirabutor (talk) 02:31, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Selam

Selam Hirabutor. Daha önce atacaktım fırsat bulamadım. Öbür vikide mesaj sayfana da link bırakmıştım, vaktin olunca haber verirsen konuşabiliriz. İyi çalışmalar.Yagmurlukorfez (talk) 14:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked puppeteer

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hirabutor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting for a prospective unblock for this account. In October 2013, I started my wiki-kariera with User:Hirabutor at the wiktionary for linguistic purposes, and I am definitely not related to User:Tirgil34. This was the first mistake which was done here, so please correct the concerned tags. The second mistake was done with User:Agaceri, he is not my sock. Though following users should be added to my sock-list: User:Greentent, User:Wailbinds, User:Kleropides. The reason for my socks is essentially a IP-vandal operating with a global IP-pool. So, I was quite helpless, I didn't know how to protect my edits from this IP-vandal, who is somehow related to the banned User:Iranzamin-Iranzamin. User:Zyma and User:Ergative_rlt are certainly sleepers of the same IP-Vandal. A Checkuser investigation would lead to nothing. When User:Zyma got familiar with my edits for the first time, he ore she immediately reverted my very first edit at the article Tur (mythology). User:Ergative_rlt is sharing the same language style with User:Zyma. Howsoever, it would be nice if my original account could be reactivated in the future. Regards. --Hirabutor (talk) 20:56, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Tirgil34 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here PhilKnight (talk) 21:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:40, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I confirmed the checkuser's findings myself, and in this context, I am declining your unblock. PhilKnight (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice if you could tell in detail which parts of my request you have declined. --Hirabutor (talk) 11:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.