User talk:Hilotsunami
| RS | This user plays RuneScape. |
{Proud to be Canadian}
Hilotsunami is a level 39 Runscape user! If he/she (youll never know whether He/she is a He or a she.) is ever on You can talk to Him/her and he/she will help you out! Hilotsunami wears All addy and a power ammy. When he/she is on he/she is usually in world 40 or 63. He/she sells reasonably priced items.
Hilotsunamis accounts:
Hilotsunami: level 39 mage archer and warrior
Hilowave: level 5 archer
Other nice people on runscape:
NewPlayer 222
D1ucb4u
Uzishrapnel
Stargazer 180
Heres the runescape website if you dont have an account www.runescape.com
After I have read your comments I will delete them unless They aren't just for me. Feel free to add comments and sign with your name below.
comments:
Comments from Wikipedia: (copying from the IP user talk) Thanks for your message about the runescape removal. Yeah, I was sorry to remove it, but since so many people contribute to wikipedia, we unfortunately have to be kind of strict about what info is linked to in articles. :( Did you check out WP:N? I think it would be ok for you to put the info on the page's talk page, though (the discussion link at the top of the page). Thanks for helping out! Peace, delldot | talk 19:51, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
- Your comment: "I added another section to the runescape page that took up less space did relate to the encyclopedia and it was deleted. Why?--Hilotsunami 22:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)"
- Hm, I don't know. Is this what you're referring to? Unfortunately, the person didn't leave an edit summary, so I can't know for sure what their motivations are, but I would guess that their reasons were the same as mine were when I removed the first thing you added. They'd probably say, if you asked them, that articles are only for notable information, and that an individual wikipedian probalby doesn't meet wikipedia's notability criteria unless they're famous or something. You might check out Wikipedia:what wikipedia is not for other possible reasons it was removed. I'm thinking specifically about Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, or webspace provider. People also aren't supposed to put links to their private webpages into articles (per WP:SPAM), so the person may have thought that linking to a list of user pages
your user pageas similar to that. Also, linking from the article namespace to other namespaces such as the user namespace is discouraged, again because the articles are for objective, encyclopedic information. I appreciate you offering to help people, but I'm afraid I have to agree with the person's actions, per these policies. But i hope this doesn't discourage you from still participating! As usual, I'm glad to discuss this or whatever else further on my talk page. PEace, delldot | talk 19:41, 26 February 2006 (UTC)- Whoops, sorry, I had another look at the edit and realized it wasn't your user page but a category that you linked to. I think the edit may have been removed because articles are not supposed to refer to wikipedia-related things (i.e. other namespaces) per WP:MOS. The notability concerns and cross-namespace linking are probably what the deal was with that. Peace, delldot | talk 19:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- That's great! Glad you worked it out. delldot | talk 18:12, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
- Whoops, sorry, I had another look at the edit and realized it wasn't your user page but a category that you linked to. I think the edit may have been removed because articles are not supposed to refer to wikipedia-related things (i.e. other namespaces) per WP:MOS. The notability concerns and cross-namespace linking are probably what the deal was with that. Peace, delldot | talk 19:53, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hm, I don't know. Is this what you're referring to? Unfortunately, the person didn't leave an edit summary, so I can't know for sure what their motivations are, but I would guess that their reasons were the same as mine were when I removed the first thing you added. They'd probably say, if you asked them, that articles are only for notable information, and that an individual wikipedian probalby doesn't meet wikipedia's notability criteria unless they're famous or something. You might check out Wikipedia:what wikipedia is not for other possible reasons it was removed. I'm thinking specifically about Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, or webspace provider. People also aren't supposed to put links to their private webpages into articles (per WP:SPAM), so the person may have thought that linking to a list of user pages
inactive
[edit]As you haven't been active in 2 years, I removed the user box indicating that you want to be an admin some day. Some people use this to find people to nominate. If you wish to readd it when you return, feel free to do so.---Balloonman PoppaBalloon 21:57, 14 August 2008 (UTC)