User talk:Hillhealth

Welcome

Hello, Hillhealth! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! --EoL talk 19:50, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.

I suggest you do not further edit the actual Schlessinger article, to avoid the impression of possible COI. Propose changes on the talk page. (Not that I have major problems with most of the last group of changes.) DGG (talk) 22:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took care of it. In the future let me do so. I have the page watchlisted. It may take me a day or two to respond, but do not get into an edit war yourself again.DGG (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Joseph Schlessinger. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. tedder (talk) 05:56, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

www.josephschlessinger.com lawsuit

hi, please provide discussion before deleting my references and moving this section on the Joseph Schlessinger page. Its just good manners!! I've reverted your changes. Also, you listed the same reference twice in your edits. Did you mean to do that? thanks.ScienceAndTruth (talk) 15:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

that material has already been ruled as representing a violation of WP:UNDUE and WP:BLP,. It is well that it was removed, but it is better that I remove it. Since it was put in again, I have done so. Considering previous edit warring on that page, I have also protected in for 2 weeks. If it resumes again, it will be protected for longer. DGG ( talk ) 16:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]