User talk:Hilit.schenkel

Welcome

Hello, Hilit.schenkel, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Hilit.schenkel, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse Invitation

Hello! Hilit.schenkel, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yakir Gabay has been accepted

Yakir Gabay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TheDragonFire (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello Hilit.schenkel. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hilit.schenkel. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hilit.schenkel|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. TheDragonFire (talk) 09:36, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not getting paid for inserting this content, this subject is close to me as i have stated before and part of bigger series i am working on. i am researching for days before inserting this content and i have collected info before putting it together, i have also followed articles from other companies and respect the guidelines given --Hilit.schenkel (talk) 10:04, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Yakir Gabay

Hello, Hilit.schenkel,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Yakir Gabay should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yakir Gabay .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:26, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Back to you, Elmidae, I am sorry to see that my article is nominated for deletion and i would like to discuss that. I have worked really long to collect this amount of information and put this article together. i was also trying to include available info over that person which was not easy, as there is not so much. Researching in Wiki on subjects with similar background, i based the structure of this article on these. i fixed it several times and i will keep looking for more sources. This is not promo, do you have concrete advise for me what can i do to make it stay? Thanks --Hilit.schenkel (talk) 13:00, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Guys Hi, i cannot figure out the status of an article i wrote, from one side, its written that its on the list for an AFD, then i see another message that its should be on the Biography of living people, so not clear what should i do next? I am totally confused Thanks,

Hilit.schenkel (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been nominated for deletion via a discussion, you can read the nominators reasoning here. Praxidicae (talk) 12:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vivion group

Hello Hilit.schenkel,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vivion group for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheLongTone (talk) 16:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vivion group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vivion group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 01:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Hilit.schenkel. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Amir Dayan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 16:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Grand City Properties concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Grand City Properties, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Grand City Properties moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Grand City Properties, is poorly referenced. I've been through the first half of the references and, with the exception of one, they were either dead links or did not support the text of the article that they were referencing. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 18:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Amir Dayan

Hello, Hilit.schenkel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amir Dayan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 14:37, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]