User talk:HighKing/Archives/2024/August
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:HighKing. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Daedalean
I came across this company and thought it may be eligible for an article. I looked around and saw that a page was created and deleted at the end of 2022. Furthermore, it was created by a sockpuppet. You were the editor who nominated it for deletion which is why I'm here asking you for advice. Do you think the toxic cloud still hovers around it? If so, I won't touch it with a 10-foot pole. Or do you think sufficient time has passed that someone could have another go at creating it? What do you think? MaskedSinger (talk) 13:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- MaskedSinger, I've no idea. The last time round, none of the sourcing met GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability, all of it was based on regurgitated announcements and PR. I don't know if suitable sourcing has since turned up. You can always create an article in drafts and ask if the sourcing meet the criteria? HighKing++ 14:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. I will research and see if there's something feasible here. MaskedSinger (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- MaskedSinger, I've no idea. The last time round, none of the sourcing met GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability, all of it was based on regurgitated announcements and PR. I don't know if suitable sourcing has since turned up. You can always create an article in drafts and ask if the sourcing meet the criteria? HighKing++ 14:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)