User talk:HighKing/Archives/2017/January
This is an archive of past discussions about User:HighKing. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbert Hartog
I have to thank you for the bit of legwork you did there-it was honest and in the spirit of Wikipedia.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:14, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Deletion review for Leslie R. Mitchell
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Leslie R. Mitchell. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. TimothyJosephWood 14:49, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
- I think that you have misunderstood the instructions at Wikipedia:Deletion review. The choices are
- Endorse the original closing decision; or
- Relist on the relevant deletion forum (usually Articles for deletion); or
- List, if the page was speedy deleted outside of the established criteria and you believe it needs a full discussion at the appropriate forum to decide if it should be deleted; or
- Overturn the original decision and optionally an (action) per the Guide to deletion. For a keep decision, the default action associated with overturning is delete and vice versa. If an editor desires some action other than the default, they should make this clear; or
- Allow recreation of the page if new information is presented and deemed sufficient to permit recreation.
- The text of your posting suggest that your preference is to "Overturn the original decision", rather than "Endorse the original closing decision". You might want to edit your post.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
not you...
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Possible returned sock?
Looks to me as if a known sock has managed to get himself an IPv6 address? Will keep an eye on this one, too. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 12:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- Looks like it. Will keep an eye. -- HighKing++ 14:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello
Hello. I noticed you added a script that I had made to your common.js page. It seems you have added more than the required part of the script. I would suggest undoing that edit. To install the page curation script, simply copy the following into your common.js page.
importScript('User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js'); // Linkback: User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js
Note: You will need to manually bypass your cache after installation. Visit Wikipedia:Bypass your cache to see how to do this.
Thanks. Lourdes 10:00, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'd forgotten all about that. -- HighKing++ 13:26, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
I am neither challenging nor supporting your statement/vote rationale. However, can you please provide diffs of instances where "this redirect is now starting to pop up as a "reason" to delete articles on notable topics" and/or "SwisterTwister makes zero attempts to "fix" articles by removing obvious promotional content or look for sources"? Thanks, JustBerry (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- @JustBerry: The latest I've come across is [1] near the bottom of the page but there are lots of others if you check SwisterTwister's comments on various AfDs. -- HighKing++ 14:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)