User talk:HiResolutionEdits

July 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 6 Dogs, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 22:34, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am very close with 6 Dogs' producer Pretty Pacc and all edits I make are adequate and accurate. HiResolutionEdits (talk) 22:35, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 6 Dogs. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 22:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, you should avoid editing the page per our COI policies. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 22:37, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshi, my friend Chase (6 Dogs) has passed and would not like Tommy Ice to be promoted on his wikipedia. I would like no more problems. Thank you. HiResolutionEdits (talk) 22:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

6 Dogs does not get to dictate what gets to go on his page or not. That is a violation of our WP:OWN policy. In addition, you are failing to follow our COI guidelines given that you have indeed said you are related to him/his friend. Also, all of your changes need to be sourced. I have not seen you provide a single source for your edits, as well as the fact that you are reverting edits without explaining why in the edit summary, as well. Please heed this warning. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (mobile) (talk) (Very Busy) 05:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are violating Wikipedia promotion guidelines: Tommy Ice's promotion is completely promotional and does not fit the page. 6 Dog's is not a friend of mine nor was a friend of mine personally, thus I do not violate COI. HiResolutionEdits (talk) 05:39, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COI notice

Hello, HiResolutionEdits. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page 6 Dogs, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 22:38, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 23:08, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have told Yoshi24517 is violating wikipedia guidelines by maintaining that his sponsor Yoshi be promoted on 6 Dog's page. HiResolutionEdits (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edited* I have told Yoshi24517 he/she is violating wikipedia guidelines by maintaining that his sponsor Tommy Ice be promoted on 6 Dog's page. HiResolutionEdits (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edits on Vivek Ramaswamy

Hai (｡･ω･)ﾉﾞ

There is a three revert rule, if you disagree with content on a page, please start a discussion on the talk page rather than edit warring, ty. A Socialist Trans Girl 10:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since your revision and prior edits are in clear violation of Wikipedia policy, this matter will have to be escalated to a point where this page in question is void of partisan bias moving forward. For example, in this page, it is stated that Ramaswamay called himself a "scientist" and that information was quoted: this is false and a severe violation of policy. Secondly, an assumption of Vivek's motive to appeal to the Evangelical Christian base is a truth claim that is unsubstantiated: this user is wanting to assert a subjective, partisan talking point. I will start here in efforts to compromise, although there are other explicitly partisan claims being made. HiResolutionEdits (talk) 11:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have disagreement with the content of the article and remove it, which someone disputes, please discuss it on the talk page instead of edit warring. Thanks. A Socialist Trans Girl 11:13, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's an Admin noticeboard incidents/edit warring thing on you

Title. Discussion is here [1] A Socialist Trans Girl 11:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please take your edit suggestions to the talk page. The above editor has kindly opened a dialogue for you to discuss the changes you want to make. Many thanks, Knitsey (talk) 11:51, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally,

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@HiResolutionEdits Please note that this means you are required to be civil at all times while discussing topics related to recent American politics, including talk pages. Also read WP:NOTFORUM so that you understand talk pages are not places to discuss the subject of an article. Doug Weller talk 14:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Vivek Ramaswamy) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:54, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages: Content, not conduct

Hi HiResolutionEdits, regarding your message at Talk:Vivek Ramaswamy, please focus on the article content when writing on article talk pages.

As these are about content, not user conduct, meta discussions about who made an edit or why, or who is currently in contact with a moderator and why are unnecessary ("No meta").

Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:53, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 14:40, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]