User talk:Hi5566776theruyihgytgfyuiuytr

May 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Richard Ellis (paediatrician)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Ellis (paediatrician) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Please leave this line alone (yo mama soooooooooooooooooooooooo fat)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Please leave this line alone (yo mama soooooooooooooooooooooooo fat), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Qpalzmmzlapq T C 01:18, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:21, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:41, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]